← All companies

WiseTech Global Limited

ASX: WTCIndustry: Software & IT ServicesAuditor: KPMGFY2026Group: Group 1
View original report →

GovernanceGovernance

AASB S2 paragraphs 5–7, Aus7.1

Governance body oversight and management's role

Reported

Oversight (pp. 211–212). The Board oversees sustainability strategy, policies, performance, targets and initiatives, monitors climate-related risks and opportunities, and is responsible for incorporating climate resilience into strategy and the business model. Climate-related risks are considered in M&A due diligence where the deal supports it, and trade-offs when setting risk appetite. The Audit & Risk Committee (ARC) reviews the Enterprise Risk Management Framework at least annually, receives quarterly management reports on new and emerging risks, and updates the Board verbally after each meeting. Responsibilities reflect the published charters.

Skills and remuneration (p. 212). The Nomination Committee reviews the Board skills matrix at least annually, including sustainability and ESG competencies, and the Board received training from an external advisor. The People & Remuneration Committee considers climate-related responsibilities in remuneration reviews, but no specific performance metrics are linked to climate and executive remuneration is not explicitly linked to climate performance, as the potential financial impact is not material.

Management (p. 213). The Sustainability & ESG function coordinates climate matters, integrating them into controls such as the Enterprise Risk Register, the Management Risk Committee and a cross-functional Climate-related Risk and Opportunity Working Group; it and the Risk function report to the Chief Financial Officer.

StrategyStrategy

AASB S2 paragraphs 10–11

Climate-related risks and opportunities

Reported

Four items are described (pp. 214–216). WiseTech concludes that the impacts of all the climate-related risks fall below its materiality threshold of 5% variance to baseline financial forecasts, and reports them because report users may expect them to affect its prospects (p. 214).

Risk or opportunity (pp. 214–216)TypeTime horizons
Physical damage to critical data center infrastructure or power outages due to extreme weather eventsPhysical riskShort, medium, long
Increase in energy prices and grid instability affects critical data centers and officesTransition riskShort, medium
Increased climate-transition policy and regulation raise costs for the global supply chain industry, with potential pass-through effects on goods demand and transportation volumesTransition riskShort, medium, long
Increased climate-transition policy and regulation increase demand for WiseTech productsTransition opportunityShort, medium, long

Short term is 2030, medium term 2040 and long term 2050 (pp. 214–216). WiseTech does not publish fixed long-term strategic planning horizons, so ten-year intervals were adopted to align with publicly available climate datasets (p. 217), with a justification printed for each year (p. 218).

AASB S2 paragraph 13

Business model and value chain

Reported

Business model and value chain (p. 210). WiseTech is a software solutions provider and is not directly involved in the manufacture or physical transportation of goods. Upstream it relies on third-party data center infrastructure, including co-location facilities and public cloud services; downstream, a Global Partner Network assists customers.

Where effects are concentrated (pp. 214–215). Physical hazards are most relevant to data centers, which are critical assets, predominantly third-party co-location sites; no offices are considered critical. While 100% of data center IT assets may be exposed, impact on business activity is considered immaterial, and data center consolidation after the e2open acquisition is expected to reduce risk further (p. 214). Rising electricity prices are likely to increase co-location providers' cost pass-through and direct costs for on-premises data centers, and grid instability carries an inherent exposure of transaction-related revenue streams at approximately 30–50% of Group revenue (p. 215).

Effects through customers (pp. 215–216). Carbon pricing may increase costs within high-emitting segments of the global supply chain industry in WiseTech's customer base; approximately 30–50% of Group revenue is derived from volume-based customer activity, not fully correlated to external trade conditions. The opportunity affects the business model through development of features such as shipment-level emissions quantification (p. 216).

AASB S2 paragraph 14

Strategy and decision-making

Partial
Partial disclosure: No formal climate-related transition plan exists (p. 211), so the key assumptions and dependencies in paragraph 14(a)(iv) are not given, and with no targets there is nothing on how targets will be achieved (14(a)(v)). Resourcing (14(b)) is described as embedded within business-as-usual operations and immaterial, with the one amount being the approximate $3.5–19.5m of R&D investment aligned to the regulatory opportunity (p. 216). No progress against previously disclosed plans is reported (14(c)); this is the first reporting period, in which the report adopts relief for comparatives (p. 209).

Pathway (p. 211). The Net Zero Carbon ambition (global operations Net Zero Carbon, products supporting customers to reduce emissions) is intended to provide strategic direction rather than represent a formal climate target. WiseTech says it does not have a formal climate-related transition plan but a high-level pathway, with low-carbon electricity and electrification of remaining fossil fuel usage as the primary levers.

Actions (pp. 211, 214, 216, 219). The Sydney HQ moved to 100% renewable electricity in FY25 and the Chicago site during FY26; low-carbon electricity (renewables or nuclear linked) will be procured for other sites where practicable. In FY26 WiseTech decided to discontinue carbon offsets (p. 211). Data center locations are expected to be consolidated after the e2open acquisition (p. 214). Energy consumption of pre-existing operations decreased following the move to a co-located data center in Australia and the transition from leased offices to co-working spaces (p. 219). Features responding to the regulatory opportunity include shipment-level emissions quantification (p. 216).

Resourcing (p. 216). Resourcing for climate-related activities is embedded within business-as-usual operations and immaterial; capital expenditure deployed toward climate-related risks is not material. Business activities aligned to the opportunity of climate-related regulation represented investment of approximately $3.5–19.5m in FY26, 1–5% of R&D investment.

AASB S2 paragraphs 15–21

Financial position, financial performance and cash flows

Partial
Partial disclosure: No amount, range or percentage is given for the size of any current or anticipated financial effect. Each risk is stated to have no material impact, against a 5% variance threshold (p. 214), and the modeled results are not shown. The only figures are that threshold, the approximately 30–50% of Group revenue exposed to grid instability or volume-based activity (p. 215) and the $3.5–19.5m of R&D investment (p. 216). For the opportunity the report gives reasons for not quantifying (not separately identifiable from other revenue drivers, high measurement uncertainty, combined quantitative information not possible or decision useful, p. 216) but cites no AASB S2 paragraph 19 to 21, and its transition relief section claims only comparatives (p. 209). Effects are described by type, such as revenue interruption, equipment replacement costs and direct data center costs; the report does not name line items, totals or subtotals in the financial statements. Not found: how financial position is expected to change given investment and disposal plans and planned sources of funding (16(c)), beyond the statements that software development is funded from operating cash flow and that climate-related capital expenditure is not material (p. 216).

Each item (names shortened) carries three statements, on the current year, carrying amounts and the short, medium and long term (pp. 214–216).

ItemYear ended 30 June 2026Carrying amounts, year ending 30 June 2027Short, medium and long term
Physical damage to data centers or power outagesNo material impactNo significant risk of material adjustmentNo material impact anticipated
Energy prices and grid instabilityNo material impactNo significant risk of material adjustmentNo material impact anticipated
Climate-transition policy and regulation raising supply chain costsNo material impactNo significant risk of material adjustmentNo material impact anticipated
Climate-transition policy and regulation increasing demand (opportunity)Not separately identifiable from other revenue driversNo significant risk of material adjustmentRevenue may be impacted but with a high degree of measurement uncertainty

Modeling of the potential financial effects of the risks across the low (1.5°C) and high (>3°C) emissions scenarios led WiseTech to conclude that all fall below its materiality threshold of 5% variance to baseline financial forecasts (p. 214). For the opportunity, combined quantitative information would not be possible or decision useful (p. 216). WiseTech funds all software development out of operating cash flow (p. 216).

AASB S2 paragraph 22

Climate resilience and scenario analysis

Reported

Resilience (p. 216). WiseTech concludes its strategy and business model remain resilient with no major adjustments or adaptations required or planned over the short, medium and long term, and says it retains significant strategic flexibility and capacity to adapt should future conditions require it.

Analysis (pp. 216–217). Scenario analysis was conducted in the year ended 30 June 2026. An external advisor developed specifications and obtained scenario information from international research and policy groups. Physical analysis covered the complete facility list and critical assets, principally data centers, including upstream critical assets, but not specific downstream geographies. Transition analysis covered the entire value chain. Opportunities were assessed qualitatively because quantitative modeling could not be achieved without undue cost or effort (p. 216).

ScenarioLow emissions (1.5°C)High emission (>3°C)
TransitionNGFS v5.0 Net Zero 2050, 1.5°C by 2100NGFS v5.0 Current Policies, 3.0°C by 2100
PhysicalSSP1-2.6, ~1.8°C (1.3°C to 2.4°C) by 2100SSP3-7.0, ~3.6°C (2.8°C to 4.6°C) by 2100

The Net Zero 2050 scenario is described as aligned with the latest international agreement on climate change (Paris Agreement) (p. 217). Time horizons are 2030, 2040 and 2050 (p. 218). Uncertainty arises from the limits of climate modeling, emissions pathways, climate policy, carbon pricing, technology and customer demand (p. 209).

Risk ManagementRisk Management

AASB S2 paragraphs 24–26, Aus26.1

Processes for identifying, assessing and managing climate-related risks

Reported

Climate-related risk management follows the Group's Enterprise Risk Management Framework, with no difference from other enterprise risks (p. 213).

Identification and assessment (p. 213). Risks and opportunities are monitored and assessed annually by the Sustainability & ESG and Risk functions, using inputs including desktop research, validated by the Climate-related Risk and Opportunity Working Group and relevant functions such as Information Systems. Assessment starts at an inherent level, with likelihood and consequence considered against a matrix of qualitative and quantitative criteria, the same matrix used for other risks. Controls are then considered to understand the residual risk, and ratings are recorded in the risk register in the Governance Risk and Compliance tool. Scenario analysis is performed periodically when significant business changes occur, first in 2023 with external climate advisors; in FY26 it validated existing risks, and an identification exercise followed the e2open acquisition.

Prioritization and monitoring (p. 213). Prioritized by residual rating, not differently to other risk types. To support external reporting, additional structured assessment aligned with AASB S2 applies, against financial, stakeholder and sector impact criteria. Reports on new and emerging risks go to the Audit & Risk Committee quarterly.

Metrics & TargetsMetrics and Targets

AASB S2 paragraphs 29–31

Climate-related metrics

Partial
Partial disclosure: Scope 1, 2 and 3 are disclosed with a methodology (pp. 218–223). FY25 emissions comparatives are given voluntarily, with relief adopted for other comparatives (p. 209). The other cross-industry categories are addressed only in narrative. No amount is given for assets or business activities vulnerable to transition or physical risks (29(b)–(c)), only percentages: 100% of data center IT assets and approximately 30–50% of Group revenue (pp. 214–215). The opportunity measure is investment of approximately $3.5–19.5m, 1–5% of R&D investment (29(d), p. 216). No capital deployment amount is given (29(e)), only that it is not material (p. 216). The internal carbon price (29(f)) is stated as none (p. 211). No percentage of executive remuneration linked to climate is stated (29(g)(ii)), only that remuneration is not explicitly linked to climate performance (p. 212). No Scope 1 and 2 split between the consolidated accounting group and other investees is shown as such (29(a)(iv)); the report says WiseTech does not hold investments in or operate through entities where it does not exercise 100% ownership and operational control (p. 218).

Greenhouse gas emissions (pp. 218–219)

tCO2eFY26FY25
Scope 1483284
Scope 2 (location-based)3,0282,958
Scope 2 (market-based)2,5402,217
Scope 389,27768,758
Total absolute gross emissions92,78872,000

FY25 comparatives are voluntary, exclude e2open and were updated for revised HVAC electricity estimates (+667 tonnes Scope 2 location-based, +768 market-based, +350 Scope 3 Category 3). Measured under the Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (2004) with an operational control boundary; methodology on pp. 220–223. Scope 3 covers Categories 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11; Categories 4, 9, 10 and 12–15 are deemed not relevant (p. 219).

Other categories. No internal carbon price is applied (p. 211). Executive remuneration is not explicitly linked to climate performance (p. 212). Capital expenditure toward climate-related risks is not material (p. 216). Exposure is given only as percentages: 100% of data center IT assets may be exposed to the physical risk (p. 214), and approximately 30–50% of Group revenue is cited both as transaction-related revenue exposed to grid instability and as volume-based customer activity (p. 215). Investment aligned to the opportunity of climate-related regulation is approximately $3.5–19.5m, 1–5% of R&D investment (p. 216).

AASB S2 paragraphs 33–36, Aus37.1

Climate-related targets

Partial
Partial disclosure: No climate-related target has been set, so none of the paragraph 33 to 36 details exist: metric, objective, part of the entity covered, period, base period, milestones, absolute or intensity basis, how the latest international agreement informed the target, third-party validation, review and monitoring, performance, gases and scopes covered, gross or net basis, sectoral approach, and planned use of carbon credits. The report states it is not required to meet any target by law or regulation (p. 212), explains why it has set none (p. 211), and says the Net Zero Carbon ambition is not a formal climate target. Classified partial because the report addresses targets only by explaining their absence.

No targets set (pp. 211–212). WiseTech is not required to meet any climate-related targets pursuant to laws or regulations, and the Group does not have targets related to climate-related risks and opportunities (p. 212). The Net Zero Carbon ambition is intended to provide strategic direction rather than represent a formal climate target (p. 211).

Feasibility assessment (p. 211). In the year ended 30 June 2026 a consultant-led assessment of the feasibility of establishing formal climate targets included emissions forecasting and abatement potential of decarbonization initiatives against commercial alignment; WiseTech concluded formal targets are not necessary at this stage. Emissions targets focused on data centers were considered, but the on-premises facility and the majority of co-location sites already procure 100% renewable electricity backed by certificates, limiting the operational benefits of targets. Scope 3 is recognized as the largest emission source, and Scope 3 targets were explored, but practical and commercial challenges in influencing supplier emissions were identified, together with recent revisions to previously announced climate targets by some technology companies.

Oversight (pp. 212–213). The Audit & Risk Committee (ARC) received updates on the business implications of having climate targets and receives annual updates on operational emissions; management proposes climate-related targets to the Board for consideration.