← All companies

Whitehaven Coal

ASX: WHCIndustry: Thermal Coal MiningAuditor: Ernst & YoungFY2026Group: Group 1
View original report →

GovernanceGovernance

AASB S2 paragraphs 5–7, Aus7.1

Governance body oversight and management's role

Reported

Board and committees (pages 58–59). The Board has ultimate responsibility for oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities (CRROs) and considers them annually. It is supported by the Audit and Risk Management (ARM) Committee, which reviews and makes recommendations to the Board on oversight of financial risks associated with climate change, and the Health, Safety, Environment and Community (HSEC) Committee, responsible for oversight of physical risks. The Board also oversees climate-related factors in all major transactions requiring its final approval. Enterprise risks were presented bi-annually to the ARM Committee in FY26.

Management and controls (pages 59–60). The Managing Director and CEO, supported by the Executive Leadership Team, has ultimate executive responsibility for sustainability matters, including CRROs. Delegated roles include the CFO (strategy, scenario analysis, financial reporting, enterprise risk management) and the Executive General Manager, Health, Safety & Environment (physical climate risks, emissions reporting). The Climate Change Working Group, chaired by the Executive General Manager, Corporate Affairs, is the control used by management to support oversight. Trade-offs are evaluated where relevant.

Skills and remuneration (page 60). The Board has undertaken a Climate Governance Skills and Competency Assessment. The remuneration framework does not include specific climate-related metrics or targets.

StrategyStrategy

AASB S2 paragraphs 10–11

Climate-related risks and opportunities

Reported

Risks and opportunities (Table 1, page 68). Policy transition risk: increased exposure to carbon regulation and policy. Project approval transition risk: increased complexity in obtaining mine approvals or commencement of new projects. Market/technology transition risk: reduced demand for coal in our export markets. Access to capital transition risk: reduced availability of debt/equity and insurance. Physical climate-related risks: inundation, bushfire and water scarcity. Opportunity: increased thermal coal production, to deliver superior efficiency and lower emissions intensity than lower-quality coals in like-for-like power stations.

Time horizons (page 63). Short term is a one year forecast (2027); medium term is the forecasting cycle from 2028 to 2031; long term extends beyond the medium term to end of mine life, which can extend for 20 years or more (2032 to 2050+). These are broadly aligned with strategic planning and decision-making processes. Each risk and opportunity table (pages 69–74) carries a Relevant time horizon graphic showing short, medium and long.

Materiality (page 68). Climate-related risks and opportunities (CRROs) are assessed against financial, health and safety, environment, legal and compliance, and reputation and community consequence types, together with likelihood. Financial impact is assessed against revenue, earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, and/or Net Present Value.

AASB S2 paragraph 13

Business model and value chain

Reported

Operations and value chain (page 57). Whitehaven operates two coal mines in Queensland and four in New South Wales (including one underground mine), in the Bowen Basin and the Gunnedah Basin, together with the Gunnedah Coal Handling Preparation Plant. The value chain spans development, operation, rehabilitation and closure of coal mining assets, upstream products and services such as diesel, explosives and tires, and the marketing, transportation and distribution of coal to the port. Products are sold on free-on-board terms.

Where climate-related risks and opportunities (CRROs) are concentrated (pages 67, 69). CRROs exist across the entire value chain, from upstream operations to mining, processing and transporting coal to the port. Physical climate-related risks are concentrated at sites in the Bowen Basin and the Gunnedah Basin. The Blackwater, Daunia, Narrabri and Maules Creek mines have obligations under the Safeguard Mechanism and represent 92% of Scope 1 emissions (page 69).

Effects (pages 69–74). Tables 2 to 7 set out the value chain impact and the impact to the business model of each risk and the opportunity, mostly across both upstream and downstream activities; project approvals mainly relate to upstream activities. For FY26 the report states no material impacts from project approvals, reduced demand and physical risks, no material adverse impacts from access to capital, and no material financial benefits from the opportunity (pages 70–74).

AASB S2 paragraph 14

Strategy and decision-making

Reported

Transition plan (page 75). Whitehaven does not have a formal climate-related transition plan. It continues to assess and pursue site-based decarbonization opportunities with prospects for economic viability and technical feasibility. Pending further advancement, the focus is site-based initiatives to mitigate Scope 1 emissions and carbon credits to meet Safeguard Mechanism obligations. At present, available operational abatement technologies are not expected to deliver the required emissions reduction in a technically feasible and economically viable manner to meet those obligations.

Levers (pages 75–77). Table 8 lists levers, including goaf sealing at Narrabri and electrified dig units (both implemented) and a proposed 26 MW Narrabri Solar Farm (FY30–FY40, subject to final investment decision and Board approval). In New South Wales, 100% of Scope 2 emissions are offset through Climate Active-certified carbon-neutral electricity; from January 2026 it is 100% GreenPower renewable energy. About $5.6m contributed to Low Emission Technology Australia since 2020.

Decisions and capital (pages 60, 63, 91). Climate-related factors are incorporated into major acquisition and investment decisions (page 60). The April 2024 Daunia and Blackwater acquisition advanced the goal to grow in metallurgical coal, now 57% of FY26 revenue (page 63). FY26 capital invested toward mitigating climate-related risks was $21m, mainly water management infrastructure (page 91).

AASB S2 paragraphs 15–21

Financial position, financial performance and cash flows

Partial
Partial disclosure: Quantified anticipated effects are limited to the policy risk (FY26 estimate of $9m and a medium-term range of $24m to $40m per annum, page 69) and the outcomes of the access to capital refinance (page 72). For the other effects (the long-term policy and capital effects, project approvals, reduced demand, physical risks and the opportunity) no amount is given: the report cites uncertainty or effects not being separately identifiable, or concludes the effect is immaterial or not expected to be material (pages 69–74), but cites no paragraph 19 to 21 by number. Combined financial effects are addressed only for the Safeguard Mechanism, where aggregating them in the long term is said not to be useful (page 69); no combined quantified effect across the climate-related risks and opportunities is given.

Quantified (pages 69, 72). Policy risk: FY25 Safeguard Mechanism liability of $7m on an equity basis; FY26 liability estimated at $9m (based on an ACCU price of $40); medium-term liability estimated at $24m to $40m per annum. Access to capital: the FY26 refinance reduced annual interest expense by $50m to $55m per annum, lowered cost of debt to 6.3% from 9.5% and increased average term to maturity to 5.8 years from 2.5 years.

Not quantified (pages 69–74). Long-term Safeguard Mechanism effects (uncertainty around legislative outcomes); project approvals (uncertainty; projects have not achieved final investment decision); reduced demand in the medium and long term (not separately identifiable from other price drivers; not expected to be material); long-term cost of capital (measurement uncertainty); physical risks (mitigation costs not separately identifiable; long-term impacts immaterial); the opportunity (climate-related benefits not separately identifiable).

Current effects and carrying values (pages 70, 83). FY26 capital expenditure of $47m related to the Vickery, Winchester South, Narrabri Stage 3 and Maules Creek Continuation projects; the portion attributable to climate-related drivers cannot be separately identified. The identified risks are not expected to result in a material adjustment to carrying values of assets and liabilities within the next annual reporting period (page 83).

AASB S2 paragraph 22

Climate resilience and scenario analysis

Reported

Scenarios (pages 78–81). Lower warming (1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, transition risk): demand trajectories informed by a published International Energy Agency scenario (Net Zero Emissions); forecasts to 2050 by Commodity Insights. The scenario assumes seaborne metallurgical and thermal coal demand declines 90% by 2050, with floors of US$72/t (real) for metallurgical coal and US$46/t (real) for thermal coal. A $40/t carbon price applies to mines under the Safeguard Mechanism, 2026 to 2050. Higher warming (well exceeding 2°C, physical risk): IPCC SSP2-4.5, approximately 2.7°C by 2100, assessed for bushfire, inundation and water scarcity at twelve sites, rail corridors and ports, for 2026, 2035, 2050 and life of mine, with no future adaptation assumed.

Results (pages 80, 83). Under the 1.5°C scenario the operating mine portfolio remains resilient until the late 2030s but is not resilient from the late 2030s through to 2050 due to a structurally lower coal price environment, assuming no change to strategy or mitigation measures. Development projects would not be financially feasible. Physical risks are not considered material to the operating mine portfolio and supply chain in the short, medium and long term.

Responses (page 83). Options include optimizing the mine portfolio, changing mine plans or curtailing production, reducing capital expenditure, renegotiating take-or-pay charges and terminating projects below a requisite 15-25% post-tax IRR.

Risk ManagementRisk Management

AASB S2 paragraphs 24–26, Aus26.1

Processes for identifying, assessing and managing climate-related risks

Reported

Framework and integration (page 61). Climate-related risks and opportunities (CRROs) are integrated into the Risk Management Framework, overseen by the Audit and Risk Management (ARM) Committee with ultimate responsibility resting with the Board. Environment and Climate Change is one of eight risk categories in the Board-set Risk Appetite Statement.

Identification, assessment, prioritization (page 62). Risks are identified through regular risk management reviews, corporate development activities, the Climate Change Working Group and scenario analysis, and reassessed after significant events such as major transactions, regulatory developments or changes in national policy settings of key customer countries. Assessments have historically relied primarily on qualitative methods, using workshops and a Risk Matrix ranking severity of consequences and likelihood. Risks are prioritized on residual risk rating and control effectiveness; climate-related risks receive no preferential weighting. Opportunities are evaluated on their significance to the business and potential to create value.

Monitoring and change (page 62). The Enterprise Risk Register was reported biannually to the ARM Committee and quarterly to the Executive Leadership Team in FY26. Transition risks have a targeted biannual review (to the ARM Committee) and physical risks a targeted annual review (to the Health, Safety, Environment and Community Committee). The process did not change in FY26.

Metrics & TargetsMetrics and Targets

AASB S2 paragraphs 29–31

Climate-related metrics

Partial
Partial disclosure: Scope 3 emissions are not disclosed: the report says it applies the transition relief for its first annual reporting period (pages 56, 86); no paragraph number is printed, and the relief corresponds to C4(b). No comparative information is given (page 56; no paragraph number is printed, and the relief corresponds to C3), so all figures are FY26 only. No amount or percentage is given for assets or business activities aligned with climate-related opportunities (29(d)): the report says there was no revenue from them in FY26 as they are still in development, and Table 20 gives no figure (page 91). Tables 18 and 19 give identical figures for transition and physical risk (page 90). No percentage of executive remuneration linked to climate is given (29(g)(ii)); the report says the remuneration framework has no specific climate-related metrics or targets (page 60).

Scope 1 and 2 only, and FY26 only: the report applies transition reliefs and does not disclose comparative information or Scope 3 emissions (pages 56, 86).

Emissions (page 85)FY26
Scope 1 emissions (t CO2-e)2,021,229
Scope 2 emissions, location based (t CO2-e)266,969
Total Scope 1 + 2 emissions (t CO2-e)2,288,198

Method (pages 85, 87–89). Operational control approach, including joint ventures, irrespective of equity interest; all emissions are in Australia and measured under the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Scheme (NGER); no change in measurement approach in FY26. Primary Scope 1 sources: diesel consumption (49.6% of Scope 1) and fugitive emissions (50.2%). New South Wales Scope 2 is covered by Climate Active-certified carbon-neutral electricity, and GreenPower from January 2026, giving net Scope 2 emissions of zero there.

Other metrics (pages 68, 90, 91). FY26 revenue from contracts with customers: $2,990m metallurgical coal and $2,411m thermal coal. Coal assets are 46% (metallurgical) and 37% (thermal) of total assets, the same figures for transition and physical risk. No FY26 revenue from climate-related opportunities. Capital invested: $47m toward opportunities (climate-related share cannot be separately identified) and $21m toward mitigation of risks. Carbon planning price: $40 per tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent, 2027 to 2031.

AASB S2 paragraphs 33–36, Aus37.1

Climate-related targets

Partial
Partial disclosure: The target is stated as a net emissions target and the report does not separately disclose an associated gross target (Table 22, page 92; paragraph 36(c)). Performance is shown for FY25 only, by facility (Table 23, page 93); the report gives no group-level progress against the 32% reduction by FY30 compared to FY23 and no analysis of trends (paragraph 35). The report says Whitehaven has not set a voluntary climate or emissions reduction target, so the only target is the one determined to support Safeguard Mechanism obligations (page 91), and says it will update the target once the outcome of the Safeguard Mechanism review is known (page 92).

No voluntary climate or emissions reduction target has been set. The target is a net Scope 1 emissions intensity reduction of 32% by FY30 compared to FY23, determined to support Safeguard Mechanism obligations (page 91).

Item (page 92)Disclosure
Applies toSafeguard Mechanism facilities (Blackwater, Daunia, Narrabri and Maules Creek in FY26)
Period and baseFY23–FY30; base period FY23
TypeIntensity-based; net; Scope 1 only
GasesThe six covered by the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Scheme (NGER)
International agreementSafeguard Mechanism supports Australia's Nationally Determined Contribution and Climate Change Act 2022 (Cth) targets, its formal emissions reductions commitments under the Paris Agreement
Third-party validationData and calculations for each facility's site-specific Emissions Intensity Determination subject to reasonable assurance
Review and monitoringExecutive Leadership Team reviews annual NGER report data; Scope 1 emissions and run-of-mine (ROM) production tracked
CreditsACCUs or SMCs surrendered for emissions above a facility's baseline
FY25 (page 93)Target intensityActual intensity (pre-offsets)Offsets required (credits earned), t CO2-e
Blackwater0.0490.057111,146
Daunia0.0470.036(67,406)
Narrabri0.0760.120188,640
Maules Creek0.0250.025(2,547)

Intensity is t CO2-e per tonne of ROM coal.