Suncorp Group Limited
GovernanceGovernance
Governance body oversight and management's role
Board (p. 43). The SGL Board is responsible for oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities (CRROs) across Australia and New Zealand, assisted by Board Committees (responsibilities set out in their Charters). It is informed of CRROs and of progress against climate-related metrics and targets at least annually, and approves the Annual Report, the Climate Transition Plan with its metrics and targets, the business plan and budget, the natural hazard allowance and the annual reinsurance program, and oversees funding to manage CRROs. The Board Risk Committee approves climate-related risk appetite and reviews and approves scenario analysis and outcomes; the Board Audit Committee oversees financial and sustainability reporting. Directors self-assess annually against a skills matrix that embeds capabilities to manage physical and transition risks.
Management (p. 44). The CEO is accountable for overseeing and managing CRROs, with responsibilities delegated to Executive Leadership Team members, including the CFO (climate-related targets, scenario analysis, reinsurance) and the CRO (second line oversight of CRROs). Climate-related risks are incorporated into risk management processes and may be escalated to the Board; consideration of trade-offs is inherent.
Remuneration (p. 44). CRROs are reflected in executive remuneration through the financial and risk measures in the Suncorp Scorecard, with no standalone climate measures or separate weighting.
StrategyStrategy
Climate-related risks and opportunities
CRROs identified (pp. 25–32). Suncorp categorizes CRROs as physical risks, transition risks and climate-related opportunities. Six are identified, each page marked with its time horizons (S, M, L):
| CRRO | Type | Horizons | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk 1 Increasing weather-related claims costs | Physical risk | S, M, L | 26 |
| Risk 2 Claims capability and capacity | Physical and transition risk | S, M, L | 28 |
| Risk 3 Reinsurance pricing and capacity | Physical risk | S, M, L | 29 |
| Risk 4 Home insurance market intervention | Physical and transition risk | M, L | 30 |
| Opportunity 1 Disaster management response and recovery | Physical opportunity | S, M | 31 |
| Opportunity 2 Transition-related products and market opportunities | Transition opportunities | S, M, L | 32 |
Time horizons (p. 25). Short: less than 3 years, aligned with the three-year business planning cycle. Medium: 3 to 20 years, where risk management processes identify and respond to emerging risks and strategic disruption. Long: more than 20 years, capturing impacts beyond the short and medium terms.
Also considered (p. 30). Fossil fuel related stranded asset risk is determined to be low for the listed equities and corporate bonds investment sub-portfolio, because of the fossil fuel exclusions in the Sensitive Sector Standard.
Business model and value chain
Physical risk to claims (p. 26). Changes in the frequency and severity of weather events may increase natural hazard claims costs and affect insurance risk and reinsurance outcomes, flowing through to pricing and customer affordability. Peril exposure is primarily severe storms, bushfires, tropical cyclones and flooding along the Eastern Seaboard of Australia, predominately affecting property-related insurance products.
Concentration (p. 28). Insurance exposure is heavily concentrated in property classes: home with $4.3 billion of Gross Written Premium (GWP), 28.1% of overall GWP, and motor with $6.6 billion, 42.5% (Compulsory Third Party excluded). In FY26 there were 18 declared natural hazard events and more than 120,000 natural hazard claims, which can create surge demand across the claims network. Uptake of solar panels and electric vehicles adds capacity pressure because repairs need training, specialized equipment and parts.
Other effects (pp. 29–32). Severe weather may affect the pricing and availability of reinsurance and capital (p. 29). Higher home insurance premiums and affordability concerns may lead to further government intervention, affecting the operating environment, cost base, underwriting, pricing models and capital requirements (p. 30). Disaster management capability supports management of claims costs and post-event demand (p. 31). The transition is expected to raise demand for insurance solutions for transition-related assets (p. 32).
Strategy and decision-making
Responses by CRRO (pp. 27–32). Reinsurance: a five-year aggregate cover and optimization of structure, attachment points and limits. Underwriting: address-level pricing, aggregate exposure guardrails and enhanced climate forecasting. Claims: Trans-Tasman surge capacity. Disaster management: a staged $25 million jobs and investment package over FY23–FY28 (p. 31). Opportunities: motor insurance for drivers of electric and hybrid vehicles, Digital Insurer, and an annual commitment of 5% of AAI Limited shareholder funds to social impact and lower-carbon impact investments (p. 32).
Climate Transition Plan (pp. 37–38). The Plan, released in the FY25 Climate-related Disclosure Report, is summarized: net-zero Scope 1 and 2 by end FY30 from an FY20 baseline; RE100 commitment of 100% renewable electricity in 2025; and a financed emissions intensity target for listed equities and corporate bonds. Implementation covers major procurement suppliers (50 suppliers; 74% publicly disclose Scope 1 and 2), claims panel builders and motor mobility suppliers, engagement with 100% of external investment managers each year, and fossil fuel exclusions under the Sensitive Sector Standard, met in FY26.
Assumptions and resourcing (pp. 32, 39). The net-zero target assumes competitive renewable electricity products and ongoing supply of hybrid and electric vehicles through FY30. Capital is deployed through business-as-usual activities and existing budgets, not allocated separately to CRROs.
Financial position, financial performance and cash flows
Current effects (pp. 26, 29, 32). FY26 natural hazard claims costs were $2,024 million (FY25: $1,355 million), 19.8% of total claims expenses and $254 million above the $1,770 million natural hazard allowance, within the insurance services expense line item. FY26 reinsurance premium was $40.2 million; its climate-related share cannot be separately identified. Transition growth is reflected in motor portfolios ($6.6 billion, 42.5% of Group GWP); $1,188 million was invested in lower-carbon impact investments.
Anticipated effects (pp. 26–29). The FY27 natural hazard allowance is $1,850 million. Relative to the FY26 net natural hazard allowance for weather-related perils, climate change is expected to raise net natural hazard costs by 3% (low warming) to 7% (high warming) around 2040 and by 3% to 11% around 2050, excluding inflation and unit growth. A five-year aggregate reinsurance cover ($800 million per annum, up to $2.4 billion in total) is expected to cap natural hazard costs at $1.85 billion in FY27 in approximately 90% of scenarios.
Not quantified. Claims capability and capacity: not separately identifiable (p. 28). Home insurance market intervention: high measurement uncertainty (p. 30). Disaster management: no material effect in FY26 or readjustment expected in FY27 (p. 31). Transition opportunities: reliable quantification not supported by available data (p. 32). Combined effects: quantitative information would not be useful at this time (p. 32).
Climate resilience and scenario analysis
Scenario analyses (pp. 33–35). Three analyses; the investment portfolio was not in scope in FY26.
| Analysis | Scenarios | Horizons | Carried out |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weather-related claims (physical) | IPCC RCP2.6 low, RCP4.5 medium, RCP7.0 (New Zealand) or RCP8.5 (Australia) high warming | 2030, 2040, 2050 | FY25 |
| Household insurance affordability | Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS)-aligned Current Policies and Delayed Transition | 2030, 2040, 2050 | FY25 |
| Australian insurance value chain (transition, qualitative) | Transition scenario #1 (2.1°C–3.5°C by 2100); #2 (1.5°C by 2100, disorderly) | to 2030; to 2040–2050 | FY24, reviewed FY26 |
Transition scenario #2 is described as consistent with the latest international agreement on climate change (p. 35).
Assessment (p. 36). Suncorp's strategy and business model are considered resilient to current and anticipated physical and transition risks over the short, medium and long term. Projected natural hazard cost increases are manageable through risk-based pricing, capital management and reinsurance; over the longer term, resilience is increasingly influenced by external factors such as affordability pressures and government intervention. Adaptive capacity: financial flexibility, operational capability and underwriting discipline. The assessment assumes existing risk management frameworks and controls operate as intended.
Risk ManagementRisk Management
Processes for identifying, assessing and managing climate-related risks
Integration (p. 42). The Risk Appetite Statement and Enterprise Risk Management Framework recognize physical and transition risks, treated as standalone risks and as causes of other risks, managed under documented practices and prioritized by risk rating. Climate-related risks are managed through risk selection, natural peril pricing, the natural hazard allowance, reinsurance, capital and advocacy. Scenario analysis is a risk management tool; outcomes inform strategic and risk management decisions but do not determine annual risk ratings.
Risks (p. 42). Material natural perils are reviewed by the insurance pricing team using modeling that combines historical claims experience with climate, event and building construction information, and monitored using climate indices tracking weather extremes.
Opportunities (p. 42). Identified, assessed, monitored and prioritized through the annual business strategy development cycle, based on regulatory and strategic importance.
CRRO identification (p. 42). Four steps: identification and description (risk documentation, prior disclosures, scenario analysis, external frameworks, strategy documents, peer disclosures); elaboration and refinement (short, medium and long term, on a residual risk basis, with quantitative indicators where feasible); assessment of relevance and material information (Risk, Obligation and Control Self-Assessment processes); and final determination by governance and decision-making committees.
Metrics & TargetsMetrics and Targets
Climate-related metrics
Emissions (p. 41). Operational control approach, in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol; measurement approach on pp. 45–47. FY25 comparatives are voluntary; FY25 Scope 2 figures were restated (footnote 2).
| tCO2-e | FY26 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 1,566 | 1,286 |
| Scope 2 – location-based | 4,019 | 6,228 |
| Scope 2 – market-based | 0 | 740 |
| Scope 3 upstream, Categories 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 (voluntary) | 15,012 | 17,695 |
| Scope 3 Category 15 financed emissions (voluntary) | 326,678 | 322,610 |
Suncorp elected the transitional relief to defer mandatory Scope 3 emissions to the second year of reporting, and says the Australian Accounting Standards Board has determined that Scope 3 insurance-associated emissions from underwriting are not required (p. 41). The subsidiary AA Insurance New Zealand and joint venture entities are outside the Scope 1 and 2 boundary (p. 45).
Other metrics. No carbon price is used to inform emission reduction decisions (p. 39). Executive remuneration has no standalone climate measures and no separate weighting (p. 44). $1,188 million was invested in lower-carbon impact investments in FY26 (p. 32). Electricity purchased and self-generated was 8,213 MWh (FY25: 11,612), reported as additional information not required under AASB S2 (p. 41).
Climate-related targets
| Target | Metric | Base | By | FY26 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational Scope 1 and 2 net-zero | Absolute Scope 1 and 2 (market-based), tCO2-e | FY20: 13,065 | End FY30 | 1,566 (88% reduced) | 1,873 (86%) |
| RE100 | % MWh renewable electricity purchased or self-generated | – | 2025 | 100% | 89% |
| Financed emissions, listed equities and corporate bonds | Investees' Scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity, at least 60% lower | FY20 | End FY30 | 76.4% reduced; 25.0 tCO2-e/$m | 76.6%; 24.8 |
Scope 1 and 2 (p. 39). At least 90% absolute reduction from FY20, with residual emissions abated through carbon credits. No carbon credits are currently used; if used, limited to no more than 10% of FY20 baseline emissions. The target is informed by the Science Based Targets initiative, is not derived using a sectoral decarbonization approach and has not been independently validated. The FY20 baseline was restated from 13,078 tCO2-e. RE100 performance is internally verified and not endorsed by RE100.
Financed emissions (p. 40). Set with reference to the Net-Zero Asset Owner Alliance (NZAOA) protocol, which recommends targets consistent with a 1.5°C global temperature limit (40-60% reduction by 2030); the target is at the upper end of that range. Methodology and target have not been validated by a third party. No carbon offsets are intended.