QBE Insurance Group
GovernanceGovernance
Governance body oversight and management's role
Governance body oversight
Group Board: The Board is responsible for the oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities that have the potential to impact QBE. The Board also oversees the environmental impact of the Group's activities and operations and sets standards on the Group's environmental responsibilities and practices. The Board is assisted in its oversight by committees composed of a majority of independent directors. The Board and Committees' responsibilities in relation to climate-related risks and opportunities are set out in the Board and Committee charters.
Risk & Capital Committee: Oversees the effectiveness of the Group's risk management framework and strategies including the consideration of adequacy of awareness, understanding and management of its risks, including climate risk.
Audit Committee: Oversees the effectiveness of the Group's financial and sustainability reporting, including climate-related disclosures.
People & Remuneration Committee: Oversees the remuneration strategy and outcomes for executives and non-executive directors, including the consideration of sustainability-related non-financial measures within incentive plans.
Group Executive Committee (GEC): The GEC is responsible for the management and execution of the Group's strategic priorities, including managing climate-related risks and opportunities, and overseeing the execution of QBE's sustainability strategy and commitments.
Environmental and Social (E&S) Subcommittee: Supports executive decision making related to progressing the sustainability strategy and initiatives and targets in the Sustainability Scorecard, including climate-related commitments. Chair: Group Executive, Corporate Affairs and Sustainability.
Executive Risk Committee (ERC): Oversees the integration of ESG risk into the Group's risk management framework. Responsibilities include the review of key enterprise risks and oversight of management strategies and treatment plans. Chair: Group Chief Risk Officer.
Group Underwriting Committee (GUC): Supports the GEC in the development, implementation and review of the Group's underwriting and reinsurance strategy, business plan and underwriting governance, including consideration of relevant climate-related risks and opportunities. Chair: Group Chief Underwriting Officer.
Management Committees: Functional representatives across the Group collaborate through management working groups to support the GEC in the delivery of QBE's strategy, initiatives and reporting. Key matters are discussed at the Sustainability Steering Committee, which supports the execution of QBE's sustainability strategy and reporting, and oversight of ESG (including climate-related) risks. It provides input and makes recommendations to the E&S GEC Subcommittee and ERC on matters including climate strategy and performance, scenario analysis, sustainability reporting, and related policies, and oversees the design and delivery of the Sustainability Reporting Programme.
Board oversight - how and how often informed
The Board receives updates on climate-related matters through periodic reporting to the Board and its Committees throughout the year.
Key matters discussed in 2025:
Board: During the year, the Board reviewed and approved QBE's Climate Transition Plan, including QBE's climate ambition and strategies across investments, operations and supply chain, and underwriting. In doing so, the Board considered trade-offs relating to feasibility, timing and potential financial impacts, recognising the need to balance climate objectives with commercial, regulatory and operational considerations, whilst continuing to support QBE's customers. The Board also received quarterly updates on progress against the metrics and targets in the Sustainability Scorecard, and approved the 2030 Sustainability Scorecard which included the targets forming part of the Transition Plan.
Risk & Capital Committee: In 2025, the Risk & Capital Committee considered the risks to QBE associated with climate change, including an outline of the Group's climate scenario analysis and management actions in relation to physical and transition risks.
Audit Committee: Updates were provided during the year on climate reporting developments relevant to the Group and progress on the Group's implementation of AASB S2. Disclosures prepared in accordance with AASB S2 were reviewed by the Audit Committee and recommended to the Board for approval as part of the 2025 Annual Report process.
People & Remuneration Committee: During 2025, the People & Remuneration Committee reviewed and endorsed for Board approval the terms of the 2025 long-term incentive (LTI) plan, including the associated performance conditions. This included the sustainability-related performance measures within this plan. At the end of the financial year, the Committee was provided with an update on progress against performance conditions for the 2024 and 2025 LTI plans, including those linked to sustainability outcomes.
Board skills
The Board has a skills matrix covering the range of competencies and experience of each director, including sustainability. The matrix is informed by an annual self-assessment by the Directors, who each rate their skills, expertise and experience against the competency areas set out in the matrix.
Management's role
Group Chief Executive Officer (CEO): Has overall responsibility for overseeing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities, with specific responsibilities delegated to members of the GEC.
Group Executive, Corporate Affairs and Sustainability: Responsible for developing, maintaining and monitoring the implementation of the Group's sustainability strategy, and for the implementation of mandatory climate reporting requirements in accordance with Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards, as well as for sustainability-related disclosures across the Group's reporting suite. Chairs the E&S Subcommittee.
Group Chief Financial Officer (CFO): Responsible for the consideration of climate-related risks and opportunities in business planning, investment and capital deployment decisions, as well as reporting on climate-related matters in the Group's Annual Report in compliance with Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards.
Group Chief Risk Officer (CRO): Responsible for evaluating the effectiveness and adequacy of the identification and management of risks across the Group, including those arising from climate change. Chairs the Executive Risk Committee.
Group Chief Underwriting Officer (CUO): Responsible for the Group's underwriting and reinsurance strategy and governance, including the identification and consideration of climate-related risks and opportunities and the execution of portfolio optimisation initiatives in response to those risks and opportunities.
The GEC is also supported in its decision-making by the Sustainability Steering Committee which comprises functional representatives from across the Group with responsibility for climate-related matters. Management's oversight of the Group's climate-related matters is supported by the use of controls and procedures, including in relation to the identification of risks and opportunities, monitoring of progress against targets, scenario analysis and the measurement of reported metrics such as greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Integration of these processes into QBE's business and enabling functions is supported by regular monitoring and reporting coordinated by the Group Sustainability function to the relevant governance committees.
Remuneration - oversight
Conditional rights granted under the 2024 and 2025 LTI plans are subject to financial and non-financial performance targets, including 10% that are subject to a sustainability performance measure. Sustainability performance within the LTI plans is measured based on progress against the initiatives and targets in our Sustainability Scorecard, which comprise metrics attributable to climate as well as other areas of sustainability. These LTI performance measures are applicable to all GEC and key senior employees. Vesting outcomes are determined by the Board at the end of the performance period based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative considerations. In addition to LTI measures, individual performance objectives of the GEC and key senior employees also include climate-related considerations as relevant to their roles and responsibilities, and are considered in determining their annual performance incentive plan outcomes.
StrategyStrategy
Climate-related risks and opportunities
This section provides information about the climate-related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect the Group's prospects, including current and anticipated impacts over the short, medium and long term.
Physical risk
Increased frequency and severity of weather-related events, resulting in increased claims - Climate-related physical risks arise from acute, weather-related events (such as more frequent and severe storms, floods, drought or heatwaves) and from chronic, longer-term shifts in climatic patterns (including changes in precipitation and temperature that may lead to sea level rise, reduced water availability, biodiversity loss and changes in soil productivity). Timeframe: Short, Medium and Long.
Transition risks
Exposure of QBE's underwriting portfolio to sectors adversely affected by the transition to a lower-carbon economy - Policy, legal, technological, market and reputational risks arise from efforts to transition to a lower-carbon economy. Certain sectors, such as fossil-fuel extraction and transportation, are considered more sensitive to transition-related pressures. Timeframe: Short, Medium and Long.
Exposure of QBE's investment assets to sectors adversely affected by the transition to a lower-carbon economy - Timeframe: Short, Medium and Long.
Opportunities
Investments in solutions to mitigate physical/transition risks of climate change - Timeframe: Short, Medium and Long.
Growth driven by new products or increased demand for products in response to market and technology shifts driven by the transition to a lower-carbon economy - Timeframe: Short, Medium and Long.
Time horizon definitions and identification process (para 11)
The identification of risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect the Group's prospects was informed by QBE's top risks process, scenario analysis and input from subject matter experts and key management across the Group. This assessment considered QBE's value chain, internal documentation such as top risks and scenario analysis outputs, and publicly available information about industry trends, regulatory developments and market expectations, where relevant.
Risks and opportunities were evaluated over the short (0 to 3 years), medium (3 to 10 years) and long term (10+ years), and involved the application of judgement, including to assess:
- the likelihood and magnitude of potential financial impacts, and the relevance of qualitative factors such as reputational implications, regulatory focus and strategic alignment;
- the expectations of primary users in determining whether information about a risk or opportunity could reasonably be expected to influence their decisions, based on consideration of industry developments, investor focus areas, and QBE's public commitments, recognising that such expectations are inherently judgemental and may not be directly observable; and
- the effect of planned or existing mitigation strategies in determining whether disclosure remained appropriate. Where mitigated impacts were not expected to materially affect the Group's prospects, qualitative disclosures were considered where there were indicators that information about QBE's approach to managing those risks or opportunities could be material to primary users' understanding of the Group's prospects.
The outcomes of the assessment were presented to the Sustainability Steering Committee, E&S Subcommittee and the Board Audit Committee.
The time horizons used to classify the impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities reflect alignment with the following:
- Short-term – aligns with QBE's three-year business planning cycle.
- Medium-term – includes the period during which the Group's interim operational and investment targets apply, and broadly aligns with the Group's long tail claims settlement periods.
- Long-term – captures the impacts that may emerge beyond the short- and medium-term horizons described above.
Key: Short-term: 0 to 3 years; Medium-term: 3 to 10 years; Long-term: 10+ years.
Business model and value chain
Physical risk - business model and value chain impact
Climate change is expected to increasingly impact the frequency and severity of weather-related natural catastrophes. These risks are continually assessed through catastrophe modelling and underwriting analysis, which inform the Group's underwriting and reinsurance strategy, as well as the calibration of the catastrophe allowance within the business plan. QBE considers business activities as vulnerable to climate-related physical risks where they are significantly exposed to catastrophic weather events and contribute materially to the Group's annual catastrophe claims cost within net insurance service expenses and net insurance contract liabilities. Classes most impacted include property and property-related product lines, with varying impacts across perils and regions. In property classes, QBE's peril exposures are most significantly driven by hurricanes, tropical cyclones, convective storms, windstorms and floods across North America, Europe and Australia. As an indicator of relative exposure within the claims profile, the modelled aggregate net annual average loss (AAL) for climate-related perils for 2026 is $654 million and represents approximately 5% of the Group's 2026 plan net claims, noting that modelled outcomes are subject to significant uncertainty. Following the exit of underperforming property portfolios and recalibration of retained property lines, QBE has experienced catastrophe losses at or below its established allowances in recent years.
Other product lines that may be exposed to physical climate risks were not considered to be vulnerable where structural features such as coverage design or regulatory protections exist to limit susceptibility to volatility from these events, or where historical claims experience indicates that such events are not a primary driver of financial performance. This includes North America Crop, where the predominant product structure provides revenue protection to farmers. Claims are primarily triggered by declines in revenue which may result from either lower crop yields or lower commodity prices, and market forces of supply and demand typically act as a stabilising mechanism between these two variables. The program is also subject to federal reinsurance arrangements that significantly limit QBE's net exposure to impacts from catastrophic weather events.
Transition risk (underwriting) - business model and value chain impact
Policy, legal, technology and market changes associated with the transition to a lower-carbon economy can alter cost structures and demand patterns across industries. These shifts may influence the risk profile and volume of insured activities and, in turn, affect premium volumes and claims experience. The Group's Marine, Energy & Aviation product class is most significantly exposed to sectors considered to be at high risk from the transition to a lower-carbon economy, and accounts for $1,758 million or 7% of the Group's gross written premium in the current year. This assessment was informed by business subject matter expertise, supplemented by sectoral analysis to the extent data was available. Judgement was applied in attributing premium to sectors and in determining which exposures were considered to be at higher risk of disruption from the transition to a lower-carbon economy, with further work planned to enhance the reliability and completeness of sectoral data.
Transition risk (investment) - business model and value chain impact
Transition-driven developments and evolving consumer preferences may adversely affect investment performance if they materially disrupt the business models of investees. QBE's analysis of the investment portfolio indicates that the Group's investment assets are not materially exposed to high transition risk, with limited overall exposure to transition-sensitive sectors. The investment classes that may be most impacted are:
- Infrastructure assets, comprising $1,426 million or 4% of total investments at 31 December 2025, which are expected to have the highest relative exposures to transition-sensitive sectors such as transportation and fossil fuel-linked infrastructure; and
- Developed market and emerging market equity investments which are passively invested through broad market index exchange-traded funds and amount to $856 million or less than 3% of total investments.
However, no material impacts are expected given the diversified composition of QBE's portfolio as well as ongoing mitigation measures, which support the overall resilience of the portfolio.
Opportunities - business model and value chain impact
Investments in climate solutions: QBE invests in climate solutions as part of its broader investment strategy to support the transition to a lower-carbon economy and deliver on its climate-related commitments. QBE's selection of climate solution investments is subject to the same return and risk appetite criteria applied across its broader investment portfolio.
Growth opportunities: Policy and technology shifts associated with the transition to a lower-carbon economy are expected to increase demand for insurance solutions that enable the deployment and operation of transition technologies (including renewables, battery storage, hydrogen and carbon capture). This creates opportunities to broaden product offerings, adapt and scale existing products, deepen risk-engineering capability and expand underwriting capacity in these segments.
Strategy and decision-making
How we respond - physical risk
- Pricing and underwriting appetite: Given that most insurance policies renew annually, QBE can regularly adjust pricing and underwriting appetite in response to emerging risks. The Catastrophe Accumulation Management team provides technical catastrophe pricing for a large number of property policies. QBE aims to regularly refresh its pricing factors using up-to-date catastrophe modelling, reflecting current accumulations, reinsurance costs, and required return on capital.
- Portfolio optimisation: QBE continues to refine its portfolio to improve risk-adjusted returns and reduce earnings volatility. This includes targeted reviews of property exposures in higher-risk regions, improved diversification and continual refinement of policy terms, supported by enhanced analytical tools and modelling capabilities.
- Catastrophe modelling capability: QBE continues to enhance its understanding of the potential impact of climate change on specific perils and regions through catastrophe modelling and climate scenario analysis. The Catastrophe Modelling Research team continues to strengthen QBE's in-house capability to validate and customise models, including for potential climate-related impacts.
- Reinsurance: In the short term, QBE manages the volatility of natural catastrophe claims through a comprehensive Group catastrophe reinsurance program. QBE also continues to explore alternative capital solutions, including the recent launch of a catastrophe bond.
How we respond - transition risk (underwriting)
- Relevance of core products: QBE core product coverage (such as property damage, third-party liability and business interruption) address fundamental insurable risks that persist across technology shifts and are underpinned by regulatory and contractual demand.
- Pricing and underwriting approach: The predominantly annual nature of our policies enables regular changes in pricing, terms and conditions, and portfolio adjustment in response to changing risk profiles and market conditions.
- Risk appetite and exclusions: QBE's Environmental & Social Risk Framework includes underwriting controls on specific high-emitting activities, limiting exposure to the most vulnerable segments under transition scenarios.
- Leveraging opportunities: The transition is expected to create demand for insurance solutions that will support new and evolving technologies. QBE is actively seeking to capture these growth opportunities.
How we respond - transition risk (investment)
- Diversified asset allocation: QBE's investment portfolio is diversified across asset classes and geographies, which limits concentration in transition-sensitive sectors.
- Policy exclusions: Direct investments in specific high-emitting activities are restricted under QBE's Environmental & Social Risk Framework.
- Corporate credit portfolio management: Consideration of transition risk will be incorporated into in-house corporate credit analysis from 2026.
- External manager selection and due diligence: External managers are evaluated to ensure that climate-related risks are appropriately integrated into their investment approach, and transition risk analyses provided by these managers are reviewed to confirm that such risks are identified and managed.
- Ongoing scenario analysis and monitoring: Transition risk scenario analysis is conducted across major public asset classes.
How we respond - opportunities
QBE continues to monitor and evaluate possible climate solution investments as part of its investment strategy. This includes assessing emerging opportunities in both public and private markets that align with QBE's return objectives and sustainability commitments.
QBE's Transition Plan includes actions to enhance capabilities and scale insurance solutions in response to growth opportunities.
Transition Plan
QBE has prepared a Climate Transition Plan that sets out its strategic ambition, implementation approach and key metrics to support the transition to a net-zero economy. We recognise the important role that QBE can play in facilitating the climate transition, through how we manage our own operations, invest our assets, select the risks and companies that we underwrite, and manage our supply chains. The Transition Plan articulates the actions QBE will take to support the transition whilst managing its climate-related risks and opportunities, and is structured around three areas: (1) Ambition; (2) Implementation and engagement strategy; (3) Metrics and targets.
Our climate ambition
To support the transition to a net-zero economy QBE is: taking action in our underwriting business; taking action in our investment portfolio; targeting net-zero operational emissions by 2030.
Implementation and engagement strategy
Underwriting: Scaling insurance solutions that facilitate the transition, including products and services that support climate change mitigation. Integrating climate risks and opportunities into decision-making by continuing to embed positions on energy sectors into underwriting appetite, implementing an assessment of in-scope customers' transition maturity, and deepening understanding of higher-emitting portfolios to better understand transition risks and identify opportunities to support customers' transition.
Investments: Financing the transition through investment in climate solutions. Continuing to incorporate climate risk and decarbonisation pathways into investment due diligence for in-house managed corporate issuers and external managers.
Operations and supply chain: Taking actions to decarbonise our operations; embedding emissions reduction measures into our supply chain.
Advocating for climate resilience: Advocating for policies that support climate resilience.
Ambition intent, scope
Underwriting: We frame our ambition around taking meaningful actions, rather than achieving a fixed emissions target. As a re/insurer and asset owner, we focus our influence on positive action by directing capital and insurance to support our customers and communities to navigate the transition to a net-zero economy. Our ability to make progress depends on sustained action across the economy, including from governments, and on the availability of reliable data from customers and investees. The scope of 'taking action' is set out in the content of the Transition Plan.
Operations: We define our ambition as a 2030 GHG emissions target that is specific, measurable, and time-bound. It is based on emissions reduction initiatives we consider feasible given our current operational footprint and profile. Scope 1, Scope 2, and selected Scope 3 (specifically Categories 3 and 6) emissions.
Applying our Transition Plan in the United States: Actions taken in the United States, and other relevant jurisdictions, will be done in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. All actions and underwriting decisions for customers in the United States will be based on an ordinary insurance business purpose, which may include the application of sound actuarial risk and underwriting principles. This will guide our approach to collecting data from customers, suppliers and investees and making decisions.
Implementation roadmap
2025: Developed QBE's Climate Transition Plan.
2026: Underwriting: commence assessment of transition maturity of in-scope customers (phased approach); develop implementation plan to scale 'insuring the transition' products and services; implement data uplift and phased analysis of emissions intensity of higher-emitting portfolios. Investments: baseline current portfolio alignment based on the Net Zero Investment Framework (NZIF) methodology; assess possibility of introducing an alignment target; assess possibility of broadening scope of climate solutions; invest $200 million in climate solutions annually through to 2030; limit the Scope 1 and 2 WACI of the public corporate debt portfolio to 20% below the WACI of the market benchmark.
2027: Underwriting: operationalise implementation plan for 'insuring the transition' products and services.
By 2030: Operations and supply chain: achieve net-zero operational ambition; 70% of QBE's global strategic suppliers to have publicly defined emissions reduction targets.
Advocacy and engagement: Develop and execute an advocacy strategy in response to QBE's assessment of climate-related risks and opportunities.
We acknowledge that key factors that will guide our approach to net zero often lie outside our direct influence. Achieving our climate ambition is dependent on factors across our value chain including our investees, insurance customers and suppliers, as well as market and industry factors such as supportive policy frameworks, regulatory environment and technology advancements. Accordingly, the Transition Plan will be reviewed and refined over time to reflect developments in data, methodologies, public policy settings and market conditions.
Key actions and dependencies - Underwriting
Scaling insurance solutions that facilitate the transition, including products and services that support climate change mitigation: The energy sector is going through significant transformation, driven primarily by investment in transition technologies. QBE recognises the opportunity to support this change through enhancing existing capabilities, complementing the Sustainable Energies Unit. During 2026, QBE will work to establish an implementation plan for scaling this opportunity with initial efforts focusing on renewable power generation given its broad relevance across QBE's portfolio. QBE will also explore opportunities to accelerate and expand its role in the growth of new technologies and extend global reach through growing existing underwriting, deploying new products and services, and enhancing underwriting and risk-engineering expertise across global teams. Details of the implementation plan will be finalised in 2026. Dependencies: The growth potential for insurance solutions that support the climate transition depends on the availability, effectiveness, and future scale of transition technologies. The commercial and economic viability of insuring transition technologies remains subject to uncertainty due to the emerging nature of these markets.
Continuing to embed our positions on energy sectors into underwriting appetite, implementing our assessment of in-scope customers' transition maturity: Since 2019, QBE has embedded its thermal coal position into underwriting, and since 2022, has applied its Environmental & Social Risk Framework to manage key environmental and social risks. QBE's positions include exclusions and enhanced due diligence requirements for fossil fuel sectors including thermal coal, oil, gas, oil sands and Arctic drilling. These positions are reviewed biennially, with refreshed positions to take effect from 1 January 2026. In 2026, QBE will commence the roll-out of the customer transition maturity assessment process for in-scope customers. The assessment will consider customers' emissions performance and, where relevant, additional factors such as decarbonisation goals. QBE will engage with customers assessed as low transition maturity and/or their brokers, and reassess these customers annually. If after three years the customer continues to be assessed as low maturity, QBE will consider if there are justifications for the customer's position and decide whether to decline or continue to provide insurance services. The assessment will be rolled out in phases, starting with the top 50 in-scope customers by gross written premium. In-scope customers are: (i) oil and gas customers who generate >60% revenue from oil and gas extraction (threshold reduced to >30% from 1 January 2040); and (ii) customers who generate >30% revenue from oil sands and Arctic drilling.
Deepening our understanding of higher-emitting portfolios to better understand our transition risks and identify opportunities to support customers' transition: QBE is prioritising the analysis of the current and forecast GHG emissions intensity of selected high-emitting portfolios, including analysis of the levers available to the sector to accelerate decarbonisation, implemented through a phased approach based on materiality of emissions, feasibility of measurement and level of QBE's influence. Levers available depend on the pace and scale of transition technology deployment, enabling government measures, and customers developing and implementing credible transition plans.
Customer engagement activities in 2025: Since 2023, QBE has set a target to engage annually with at least 50 priority customers, which it continued to achieve in 2025. Engagement activities included monitoring the priority customers cohort; reviewing public disclosures against recognised climate disclosure frameworks; engaging with priority customers at renewal in collaboration with brokers; and monitoring customer emissions and disclosure developments. Information collected is not used to determine individual customer premiums.
Key actions and dependencies - Investments
Financing the transition through investment in climate solutions: QBE has set a target to allocate at least $200 million to climate solutions investments annually from 2026 through to 2030, guided by defined climate solutions criteria and the same return and risk appetite standards applied across the broader investment portfolio. Dependency: sufficient and ongoing supply of eligible climate solution investments.
Continuing to incorporate climate risk and decarbonisation pathways into investment due diligence for in-house managed corporate issuers and external managers: Credit assessments and due diligence include consideration of emissions intensity, climate risks, and alignment with net-zero pathways, progressively embedding new datasets and scenario insights.
Continuing to engage with our highest corporate emitters and external managers: QBE will engage annually with the top 20 corporate issuers by Scope 1 and 2 carbon intensity based on enterprise value including cash (EVIC) in in-house managed investment grade corporate credit and high yield portfolios, as well as external managers as part of the annual due diligence process, to gather insights on emissions, climate risks, net-zero alignment and planned improvements. QBE will not make individual investment and divestment decisions solely on the basis of transition maturity.
Monitoring the carbon intensity of our public corporate debt portfolio: QBE has set a target to limit the Scope 1 and 2 WACI of its public corporate debt portfolio to 20% below the WACI of its market benchmark, expanding scope to encompass high yield debt and emerging market debt. Investment selection excludes issuers in thermal coal and oil and gas sectors, in accordance with QBE's Environmental & Social Risk Framework.
Advancing the climate alignment of our portfolio: In 2026, QBE will baseline the net-zero alignment of its investment portfolio and consider whether to formalise an alignment target.
Key actions and dependencies - Operations and supply chain
Taking actions to decarbonise our operations: Planned decarbonisation initiatives focus on phasing out gas heating and progressing energy-efficiency upgrades in owned and leased offices, as well as maintaining renewable electricity sourcing; transitioning fleet vehicles to more fuel-efficient alternatives including hybrid options; and limiting air travel emissions. Priority is placed on reducing in-scope emissions. Carbon removal certificates will be sourced to neutralise emissions that remain after implementing reduction measures. The cost of emissions reduction initiatives, carbon avoidance and removal certificates and renewable electricity certificates will be funded through QBE's internal carbon price mechanism. Dependencies include cooperation from landlords, fleet transition feasibility, and ongoing availability of high-quality renewable energy contracts and certificates.
Embedding emissions reduction measures into our supply chain: QBE has introduced a target for 70% of global strategic suppliers to have publicly defined emissions reduction targets by the end of 2030. QBE will engage strategic suppliers through tailored outreach and capability-building resources, embed sustainability considerations into sourcing and supplier management processes, and pursue collaboration and knowledge sharing with suppliers that have established commitments.
Advocating to build climate resilience: Our own analysis of QBE's climate resilience has deepened understanding of the complex challenges climate change poses to communities and customers. Building greater resilience requires a collaborative effort across a broad network, including governments, regulators, communities, the financial sector, and other key stakeholders. Through industry memberships, QBE advocates for stronger community resilience measures, more effective climate-related policy settings and industry guidance. QBE also engages with trade associations and industry bodies to progress initiatives that support climate resilience.
Progress against previous targets
In 2021, QBE established interim targets for 2025, progress on which is disclosed in the 'Metrics and targets' section. This year, QBE has revised the scope of its ambition and updated associated targets, which will take effect from 2026.
Capital deployed towards climate-related risks and opportunities
Climate-related risks and opportunities are managed as part of business-as-usual activities and are resourced through existing budgets across the Group. Other than investments in climate solutions, the Group did not identify material direct expenditure attributable solely to the delivery of climate-related initiatives during the reporting period.
Financial position, financial performance and cash flows
Current financial effects
Physical risk: In 2025, net catastrophe claims of $751 million were below the Group's allowance of $1,160 million. Net catastrophe claims included $715 million attributable to climate-related natural events, such as the Californian Wildfires, Hurricane Melissa and a series of storms and floods in Australia, including Cyclone Alfred.
Transition risk (underwriting): There were no identifiable transition-specific impacts in the current period for either the Marine, Energy & Aviation product segment or the Group's gross written premium more broadly. Group premium movements primarily reflected targeted organic growth and the lower strain from exited lines.
Transition risk (investment): There were no specifically identifiable transition-related impacts on the Group's investment assets or investment performance in the current reporting period.
Opportunities - climate solutions investments: The carrying value of the Group's investments at 31 December 2025 included $2,359 million of climate solutions investments which represented 7% of QBE's total assets under management.
Opportunities - growth: The climate-related opportunities identified did not have a material effect on the Group's financial position, financial performance or cash flows in the current period.
Anticipated financial effects
Physical risk: Short-term claims volatility is expected to continue to be influenced by natural variability in weather and catastrophe activity, in addition to the effects of climate change. In the short term, potential impacts of physical risks are incorporated into the Group's business planning process, primarily through the catastrophe allowance, and implicitly considered in other planning assumptions relating to premium rates and reinsurance, but are not separately identifiable from other factors. The Group's net catastrophe allowance for 2026 is set at $1,130 million. Plan net catastrophe claims as a percentage of net insurance revenue is not expected to change materially from 2026 levels over the three-year plan period. Scenario analysis of property exposures indicates that under the RCP4.5 pathway, the increase in catastrophe AAL before reinsurance due to climate change across key peril regions is not currently expected to be significant by 2030, and is not expected to result in claims costs that materially exceed the Group's catastrophe allowance on an annualised basis. Over the long term, the financial effects of physical climate risks are expected to become more significant, with a projected increase in gross AAL of around 20% at the Group level by 2090 under the RCP4.5 pathway.
Transition risk (underwriting): Analysis of medium to long-term transition risk was focused on lines of business with the most significant exposures to transition-sensitive sectors. Current available data does not support the reliable quantification of transition-specific effects; work underway to improve sectoral mapping and data quality is expected to enable more detailed analysis over time. In scenarios where decarbonisation accelerates, customers in carbon-intensive industries such as oil and gas extraction and certain transport segments are expected to face higher compliance costs, technology investment requirements and, in some cases, stranded asset risk. These pressures could influence premium volumes and claims experience of exposed product lines, with possible resulting impacts to the Group's insurance operating result and net insurance contract liabilities. In a delayed transition pathway, these effects are expected to be deferred but more concentrated post-2030. QBE's exposures are expected to be mitigated by a considered approach to customer selection and engagement, ongoing demand for coverage, portfolio agility and underwriting discipline.
Transition risk (investment): At a total investments level, the anticipated financial effects of transition risk are expected to be limited based on the current portfolio mix, investment strategy and policies. No material anticipated financial impacts are expected from transition risk in infrastructure assets, as these exposures are actively considered and managed by external managers. While scenario analysis indicates that certain industries and issuers within passively held developed and emerging market equity portfolios may experience more significant climate-adjusted value changes under a Net Zero 2050 scenario, the overall impact is mitigated by the diversified nature of these investments.
Opportunities - climate solutions investments: Effective from 2026, QBE has set a target to invest $200 million in climate solutions annually through to 2030. The financial effects of these investments will be reflected over time through investment income and the composition of assets under management. At this stage, QBE does not expect the returns generated by these investments to be materially different from those of other equivalent assets from the same issuer, as all investments are selected in line with QBE's investment return and risk appetite criteria.
Opportunities - growth: QBE has applied the exemption permitted by AASB S2 and has not disclosed information about the anticipated financial effects of growth opportunities driven by market and technology shifts, as they are considered commercially sensitive.
Climate resilience and scenario analysis
QBE undertakes scenario analysis to further understanding of the impacts of climate risks and opportunities and the resilience of the Group's strategy to climate-related changes, developments and uncertainties.
Physical risks - scenario analysis (underwriting)
Scope of assessment: QBE has undertaken physical climate risk modelling of its property exposures across key perils and geographic regions where the Group has material catastrophe exposure. These comprise hurricanes and cyclones in the North Atlantic and Australia; convective storms in the United States and Australia; windstorms in Europe; floods in the United States, Australia and Europe; bushfires in Australia; and wildfires in the United States. The scope was determined through a risk-based assessment that prioritised the top peril-region exposures based on their contribution to the Group's AAL. Collectively, the modelled exposures account for over 90% of QBE's non-earthquake catastrophe AAL. The analysis projects gross AAL (before reinsurance) to provide a pre-mitigation view of potential losses.
Scenarios: Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) sourced from the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) and Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs) sourced from the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6): SSP1-1.9 aligns with a pathway that limits warming to around 1.5°C; RCP4.5 reflects a stabilisation scenario with warming of approximately 2.5–3°C; RCP8.5 represents a high-emissions pathway with warming exceeding 4°C by 2100.
Time horizons: 2030, 2050 and 2090.
Key assumptions: The analysis assumes constant exposure over time to attribute changes in modelled losses specifically to climate change, meaning no adjustments are made for changes in population, mitigation measures, building standards or portfolio mix. Assumptions are primarily derived from IPCC AR5 and AR6, operationalised through catastrophe models and commissioned scientific research, incorporating assumptions about global climate policy ambition, macroeconomic trends, energy demand and mix, and pace of technological innovation, translated into regional hazard impacts using peril-specific assumptions from vendor catastrophe models and scientific literature. For example: in Australia, rainfall projections are based on the 2024 Australian Rainfall and Runoff Guidelines, while hailstorm frequency and severity is projected using QBE commissioned research from the University of New South Wales published in 2025; in Europe, windstorm and flood projections are derived from downscaled regional climate models including the EURO-CORDEX framework; in the United States, wildfire risk is modelled using relationships between Vapor Pressure Deficit and burned area, combined with regional vegetation dynamics and fuel availability.
Reporting period: The analysis was carried out in 2025 using current period in-force exposure data where available. The catastrophe models used incorporated vendor updates available to QBE at the time. In some cases, climate adjustments continue to rely on static studies published in prior years, particularly where updated vendor models are not yet available. QBE reviews its scenario analysis annually and updates inputs when material changes in exposure, model availability or scientific understanding occur.
Our resilience to climate-related physical risks
Scenario analysis indicates that projected increases in AAL across key perils through to 2050 remain within the bounds of normal portfolio variability when annualised at a total Group level. While some perils, such as flood and wildfire in Europe, Australia and the western United States, exhibit greater sensitivity to climate change, their impacts are geographically concentrated and less significant in aggregate. North American hurricane continues to be the most significant physical climate risk exposure for QBE. By 2090, modelled outcomes diverge more significantly. These projections are based on gross exposure and do not account for the mitigating effects of reinsurance or portfolio management actions.
The Group's underwriting strategy is considered resilient to expected changes in physical risk across short, medium and long-term time horizons, supported by a combination of measures that collectively support QBE's ability to adapt to evolving climate conditions and maintain underwriting and capital resilience over time.
Significant areas of uncertainty include the future availability and cost of reinsurance which may affect the Group's ability to transfer risk, and potential market reactions to repricing where affordability constraints could impact demand for insurance in higher-risk regions. To address these uncertainties, QBE continues to explore alternative capital solutions, including the recent launch of a catastrophe bond. QBE recognises that responding to uncertainties in insurance affordability involves engagement across both the public and private sectors to enhance the resilience of customers and communities.
Transition risks - scenario analysis (investment and underwriting)
QBE has applied a combination of quantitative modelling and qualitative assessment to evaluate the potential impacts of climate transition scenarios across its investment and underwriting portfolios.
Investment scope: External modelling platforms were leveraged to assess potential transition risk impacts for selected public asset classes, collectively representing over 80% of the carrying value of the Group's investments, including sovereign and semi-government bonds, corporate bonds, high yield debt, emerging market debt and developed market equities. A qualitative analysis was performed for QBE's infrastructure assets, using scenario pathways supplemented with sector-level research and insights from external investment managers.
Underwriting scope: A qualitative analysis was performed, focused on the Group's Marine, Energy & Aviation portfolio and leveraging the outcomes of sector-level transition impact projections, to assess directional impacts under a range of climate transition pathways.
Scenarios: The following Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) transition scenarios were applied: Net Zero 2050, where immediate and coordinated global policy action limits temperature rise to 1.5°C; Delayed Transition, reflecting postponed and fragmented mitigation efforts, resulting in temperature rise to 1.7°C; and Current Policies, a reference scenario based on existing policy settings, resulting in warming of 3°C (used as a baseline in the investment quantitative analysis). These represent a diverse range of plausible transition pathways, including one aligned with the latest international climate agreement.
Time horizons: Investment - 2050; Underwriting - 2030 and 2050.
Key assumptions: Investment - scenario assumptions including projected carbon prices, sector and regional emissions pathways, macroeconomic trends and energy system transitions are primarily sourced from NGFS Phase V. Company-specific data, including financial metrics, business segmentation and GHG emissions, are sourced from public disclosures and market data providers to the extent available; where incomplete, sector and country proxies and modelling assumptions are applied. The qualitative assessment for infrastructure assets is informed by sector exposures and qualitative information provided by external managers. Underwriting - the assessment leverages sector-level transition impact projections performed in 2022, which use scenario assumptions sourced from NGFS Phase II to quantify changes in sector profitability under each scenario. The analysis assumes a static portfolio composition, with no adjustments made for potential changes in business mix, customer transition readiness, or variability in company-level outcomes. Future enhancements are planned to enable more detailed analysis, including improvements in granularity and consistency of underwriting sectoral data and updating scenario inputs.
Reporting period: The analysis was carried out in 2025 and reflects the Group's current period investment exposures and current portfolio mix.
Our resilience to climate-related transition risks
QBE's investments and underwriting strategy are expected to be resilient to climate-related transition risks based on the outcomes of scenario analysis and the Group's current portfolio composition. In relation to investments, the assessment relies on issuer-reported and third-party data which may be subject to limitations relating to the timing and coverage of reported information.
Significant areas of uncertainty considered in the assessment of underwriting resilience include potential affordability constraints in higher-risk segments, and the pace and cost of technological change which increase uncertainty in claims costs. QBE's Transition Plan includes actions that will help mitigate these uncertainties, including strengthening underwriting and risk-engineering capabilities to respond to evolving technologies and loss patterns, phasing in analysis of emissions intensity across selected high-emitting portfolios and implementing an assessment of transition maturity for in-scope oil and gas, oil sands and Arctic drilling customers to inform appetite and engagement. These actions, together with ongoing monitoring through underwriting guidelines and risk assessment frameworks, are expected to support the continued resilience of the underwriting portfolio.
Risk ManagementRisk Management
Processes for identifying, assessing and managing climate-related risks
Identifying and assessing climate-related risks
Climate change continues to be identified as one of the top risks for QBE and is managed as a sub-class of strategic risk within QBE's Risk Management Strategy. Climate-related risks are identified and assessed through the following processes:
Scenario analysis: Climate scenario analysis is used to assess the potential impacts of identified climate-related risks on QBE's underwriting and investment portfolios under a range of future climate pathways. The scope of scenario analysis is informed by QBE's assessment of risk exposures and concentrations. The outcomes of scenario analysis provide insights into the magnitude of potential impacts, which are then incorporated into QBE's risk assessment processes. This inputs into the top risk process.
Top risk process: QBE conducts a regular review of top risks, incorporating top-down horizon scanning, review of regulatory developments and bottom-up business input to identify top and emerging risks. As part of this process, climate risk has been identified as a top risk. Risks are assessed for their potential impact and likelihood, and the assessment considers both quantitative and qualitative impacts, in line with the Risk and Control Self-Assessment (RCSA) Standard. This inputs into the financial materiality assessment.
Financial materiality assessment: In 2025, climate-related risks were assessed to identify the risks that could reasonably be expected to affect the Group's prospects.
Managing and monitoring climate-related risks
Climate risk is monitored and managed in line with QBE's Enterprise Risk Management Framework, in its Risk Management Strategy. Monitoring of climate-related risks is supported by the following:
- Climate indicators are monitored through the Group ESG Risk Dashboard. The dashboard is presented to management on a regular basis to support awareness and understanding of climate risk.
- QBE has implemented a suite of policies to support climate risk management, including the Group Environment Policy, Environmental & Social Risk Framework, and Supplier Code of Responsible Conduct. These policies apply to operations, underwriting and investment portfolios and third-party relationships.
- Climate and other ESG-related topics are included in QBE's Key Reputational Issues List, requiring additional review prior to external disclosure. A greenwashing checklist and training module are available to guide employees in managing reputational and regulatory risks.
- An introductory ESG training module, which covers climate risk, was required to be undertaken by all Risk and Compliance staff globally this year to uplift capability around the identification, monitoring and management of climate and other ESG-related risks. Function-specific training is available to underwriting teams.
Climate risk is managed and monitored in line with the three lines model, with first line ownership of the risks across underwriting, investments, supply chain and operations. QBE's independent Risk and Compliance team provide second line review and challenge of management actions in place relating to climate risk management, including in relation to the Sustainability Scorecard and Environmental & Social Risk Framework, to enable effective implementation and monitoring. Second line also supports the review of risks and controls relating to QBE's internal and external climate risk management and obligations. The Group's internal audit function provides independent assurance over the effectiveness of climate risk management, including the adequacy of controls and governance processes.
Identifying and assessing climate-related opportunities
QBE continuously sources and evaluates climate-related opportunities, including:
- monitoring and evaluating possible climate solution investments as part of the Group's investment strategy;
- monitoring and evaluating climate and insurtech solutions to support customer resilience and enhance QBE's underwriting, claims and risk-engineering capabilities via QBE Ventures; and
- identifying and evaluating underwriting opportunities that support the transition to a lower-carbon economy, which has been a particular focus in the current year as part of the development of the Group's Transition Plan.
In 2025, QBE established a dedicated workstream to systematically assess and develop a strategy for climate-related opportunities within the underwriting portfolio, following a phased approach:
Phase 1: Identify and evaluate potential climate-related opportunities based on consideration of emerging market trends, QBE's existing capabilities and footprint, market size and growth potential, feasibility and scalability.
Phase 2: Develop strategic options and implementation requirements for advancing priority climate-related opportunities, informed by scenario analysis and quantitative modelling.
Phase 3: Develop implementation plan to deliver targeted interventions for priority climate-related opportunities, outlining key actions, milestones and governance for future execution. This phase is planned to be delivered in 2026.
Integration into overall risk management
Climate change is managed as a sub-class of strategic risk within QBE's Risk Management Strategy and is integrated into the top risk process, financial materiality assessment, the Enterprise Risk Management Framework and the three lines model, as described above.
Metrics & TargetsMetrics and Targets
Climate-related metrics
Greenhouse gas emissions
Operations and supply chain measures table (2025)
| MEASURE | TARGET | UNIT | BASELINE YEAR | 2025 | STATUS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy use | 25% reduction by 2025 | GJ | 2019 | 177,568 (↓30%) | Achieved |
| Renewable electricity use | 100% by 2025 | MWh | 2018 | 16,347 (100%) | Achieved |
| Scope 1 and 2 (market-based) | Gross 30% reduction by 2025 | tCO2e | 2018 | 8,728 (↓73%) | Achieved |
| Scope 1, 2 (market-based) and selected Scope 3 | Net – Net zero by 2030 | tCO2e | – | 17,985 | In progress |
| Scope 1, 2 (market-based) and selected Scope 3 | Gross – 16,900 tCO2e by 2030 | tCO2e | N/A | 17,985 | In progress |
| Scope 1, 2 (market-based) and Scope 3 (defined inventory) | Maintain carbon neutrality for a defined inventory of emissions | tCO2e | N/A | – | Achieved |
Absolute GHG emissions - defined inventory (2025 tCO2e)
| Category | 2025 tCO2e |
|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 9,820 |
| Scope 2 (location-based) | 8,450 |
| Total Scope 1 and 2 – gross emissions (before offsets and renewable energy attribute certificates) | 18,270 |
| Category 1 – Purchased goods and services | 1,076 |
| Category 2 – Capital goods | 2,566 |
| Category 3 – Fuel- and energy-related activities | 2,369 |
| Category 5 – Waste generated in operations | 255 |
| Category 6 – Business travel | 7,266 |
| Category 7 – Employee commuting | 5,579 |
| Category 11 – Use of sold products | 1,085 |
| Category 13 – Downstream leased assets | 214 |
| Total Scope 3 (defined inventory) | 20,410 |
| Total gross operational Scope 1, 2 and 3 (defined inventory) | 38,680 |
| Scope 2 (market-based) | 418 |
| Total Scope 1, Scope 2 (market-based) and Scope 3 (defined inventory) | 30,648 |
| Carbon offsets | (30,648) |
| Net GHG emissions (carbon neutral) | – |
Measurement methodology
QBE measures its GHG emissions in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (2004) as required by AASB S2. The operational control approach has been adopted to define the organisational boundary; QBE reports 100% of emissions from operations over which it has the authority to introduce and implement operating policies, including all entities in the consolidated accounting group with the exception of Challenger Private Debt Q Fund over which QBE does not have operational control. Associates and unconsolidated investees are also excluded from the Group's Scope 1 and 2 emissions boundary on this basis.
Scope 1 and 2: Measured using the indirect method, applying relevant emission factors to activity data. Emission factors are sourced from national and international authorities including NGER (Australia), DEFRA (UK), EPA (US), the Ministry for the Environment (New Zealand), and the IEA. In countries where high-quality, locally published emission factors are not available, proxy factors from DEFRA or other internationally recognised sources have been applied. Primary sources such as utility invoices and fuel card records are prioritised where available. Reported Scope 1 includes mobile combustion (fuel used in owned/controlled vehicles, excluding novated leases), stationary combustion (natural gas for heating in owned/leased buildings), and fugitive emissions (refrigerant leakage from HVAC systems). Reported Scope 2 (location-based) includes purchased electricity, purchased heating (gas), and purchased heating and cooling (electricity) centrally provided by landlords. Reported Scope 2 (market-based) emissions have been measured after accounting for electricity consumed under green electricity contracts and unbundled energy attribute certificates surrendered by QBE.
Scope 3: Measured using an indirect estimation approach, applying relevant emission factors to activity data. Primary data used where reliable internal records available (supplier invoices, travel management systems, asset registers); secondary data and extrapolations applied where unavailable. Emission factors sourced from third-party data providers, with DEFRA factors applied as proxy where jurisdiction-specific factors unavailable. Categories included in the defined inventory: Category 1 (Purchased goods and services – limited to office paper and electricity usage from externally hosted data centres), Category 2 (Capital goods – purchased IT equipment), Category 3 (Fuel- and energy-related activities), Category 5 (Waste generated in operations), Category 6 (Business travel), Category 7 (Employee commuting), Category 11 (Use of sold products – policyholder travel for claims), Category 13 (Downstream leased assets). In line with the transitional provisions in AASB S2 which permit the deferral of full Scope 3 disclosures until the second year of application, QBE will expand its Scope 3 disclosures from full year 2026 to include all sources within its value chain that are material and relevant to the Group's operations.
Additional reported emissions in 2025 include fugitive emissions within Scope 1 and emissions from centrally provided electricity in landlord-managed buildings within Scope 2. Baseline emissions used to measure reduction targets have not been restated to reflect these inclusions.
Investment measures table (2025)
| MEASURE | TARGET | TYPE | BASELINE YEAR | 2025 | STATUS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engagement | All external managers across our investment portfolio | N/A | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Engagement | 20 highest emitters in the investment grade corporate credit portfolio | N/A | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Financing the transition | Increase climate solutions investments to 5% of assets under management by 2025 | Absolute | N/A | 7% | Achieved |
| Carbon intensity | 25% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 emissions of developed market equity portfolio by 2030 | Intensity | 2019 | 36% reduction | Achieved |
| Carbon intensity | Maintain a low carbon risk rating in the Scope 1 and Scope 2 WACI of the investment grade corporate credit portfolio | Intensity | N/A | 17 tCO2e/$M sales | Achieved |
Transition risks
The Group's Marine, Energy & Aviation product class accounts for $1,758 million or 7% of the Group's gross written premium in the current year, being the exposure most significantly exposed to sectors considered at high risk from the transition to a lower-carbon economy. In investments, infrastructure assets comprising $1,426 million or 4% of total investments at 31 December 2025 and developed/emerging market equity investments amounting to $856 million or less than 3% of total investments are considered the classes with the highest relative exposure to transition-sensitive sectors.
Physical risks
The modelled aggregate net annual average loss (AAL) for climate-related perils for 2026 is $654 million and represents approximately 5% of the Group's 2026 plan net claims.
Opportunities
The carrying value of the Group's investments at 31 December 2025 included $2,359 million of climate solutions investments, representing 7% of QBE's total assets under management.
Capital deployment
Climate-related risks and opportunities are managed as part of business-as-usual activities and are resourced through existing budgets across the Group. Other than investments in climate solutions, the Group did not identify material direct expenditure attributable solely to the delivery of climate-related initiatives during the reporting period.
Internal carbon prices
To support the achievement of QBE's operational emissions targets, an internal carbon price of $65 per metric tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent has been applied to GHG emissions within the scope of QBE's net-zero target and carbon neutrality commitment. This price reflects the estimated cost of emissions management, including investment in emissions reduction initiatives, procurement of renewable electricity, and the future purchase of carbon removal certificates. The internal carbon price is applied to divisions based on actual operational GHG emissions and is intended to incentivise decarbonisation while funding Group-wide environmental initiatives. The pricing mechanism is reviewed periodically and is informed by projected costs associated with maintaining carbon neutrality and achieving net-zero commitments.
Remuneration
Conditional rights granted under the 2024 and 2025 LTI plans are subject to financial and non-financial performance targets, including 10% that are subject to a sustainability performance measure. Sustainability performance within the LTI plans is measured based on progress against the initiatives and targets in the Sustainability Scorecard, which comprise metrics attributable to climate as well as other areas of sustainability. This component represents 2.0% of total executive key management personnel remuneration recognised in the current year, of which 1.1% is estimated to be attributable to climate-related initiatives based on the proportion of metrics in the 2023–2025 Sustainability Scorecard that are attributable to climate.
Climate-related targets
Operations and supply chain targets
| MEASURE | TARGET | UNIT | BASELINE YEAR | 2025 | STATUS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy use | 25% reduction by 2025 | GJ | 2019 | 177,568 (↓30%) | Achieved |
| Renewable electricity use | 100% by 2025 | MWh | 2018 | 16,347 (100%) | Achieved |
| Scope 1 and 2 (market-based) | Gross 30% reduction by 2025 | tCO2e | 2018 | 8,728 (↓73%) | Achieved |
| Scope 1, 2 (market-based) and selected Scope 3 | Net – Net zero by 2030 | tCO2e | – | 17,985 | In progress |
| Scope 1, 2 (market-based) and selected Scope 3 | Gross – 16,900 tCO2e by 2030 | tCO2e | N/A | 17,985 | In progress |
| Scope 1, 2 (market-based) and Scope 3 (defined inventory) | Maintain carbon neutrality for a defined inventory of emissions | tCO2e | N/A | – | Achieved |
Selected Scope 3 emissions comprise those relating to fuel- and energy-related activities (Category 3) and business travel (Category 6). These targets have not been renewed beyond 2025 (energy use, renewable electricity). Renewable electricity target based on RE100 Climate Group's materiality threshold guidance. Baseline years were previously set at 2019 for Scope 1 and 2 emissions and 2022 for in-scope Scope 3 categories. Baseline year references have been removed for the net-zero target and have not been set for the associated gross target, reflecting a shift in how progress will be assessed, with a focus on reviewing total emissions against expectations based on planned initiatives rather than measuring reductions from a historical baseline. These targets exclude mobile combustion emissions from employee personal use of QBE's leased vehicles and, where applicable, associated upstream fuel and energy emissions. The energy use target also excludes purchased heating and cooling (electricity) centrally provided by landlords.
Approach to target-setting and monitoring: The Group's refreshed operational targets were determined through a structured process that considers the current emissions profile and the feasibility of emissions reduction initiatives across regions. Divisional management was engaged to assess the practicality of proposed initiatives, and targets were set based on their expected impact. The process also considered the materiality of emission sources to prioritise actions where reductions would be most meaningful. These targets have not been validated by an external third party. However, they are reviewed and endorsed internally by the Sustainability Steering Committee and the GEC E&S Subcommittee, and approved by the Board. Progress is monitored quarterly and reported to the GEC and the Board, with regular engagement between the Group Sustainability function and initiative owners to assess performance and identify corrective actions where required.
During the year, the Group also completed foundational work to set its supply chain target (70% of global strategic suppliers to have publicly defined emissions reduction targets by 2030), including confirming the scope of strategic suppliers, assessing feasibility, and finalising approvals through established sustainability governance processes. This target takes effect from 1 January 2026.
The Group's refreshed operational emissions targets are not derived using a sectoral decarbonisation approach, or informed by the latest international agreement on climate change. QBE's GHG emissions targets are calculated using the market-based method for Scope 2 emissions, reflecting emissions associated with contractual instruments such as GreenPower agreements and energy attribute certificates.
Investment targets (2025)
| MEASURE | TARGET | TYPE | BASELINE YEAR | 2025 | STATUS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engagement | All external managers across our investment portfolio | N/A | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Engagement | 20 highest emitters in the investment grade corporate credit portfolio | N/A | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Financing the transition | Increase climate solutions investments to 5% of assets under management by 2025 | Absolute | N/A | 7% | Achieved |
| Carbon intensity | 25% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 emissions of developed market equity portfolio by 2030 | Intensity | 2019 | 36% reduction | Achieved |
| Carbon intensity | Maintain a low carbon risk rating in Scope 1 and Scope 2 WACI of investment grade corporate credit portfolio | Intensity | N/A | 17 tCO2e/$M sales | Achieved |
These targets applicable for 2025 will be superseded from 2026 by updated targets set out in the Transition Plan (invest $200 million in climate solutions annually through to 2030; limit Scope 1 & 2 WACI of the public corporate debt portfolio to 20% below the WACI of the market benchmark).
Approach to target-setting and monitoring: In 2025, QBE refreshed its investment targets as part of the Transition Plan, following the completion of interim 2025 targets and an updated assessment of market conditions, data availability and feasibility. While QBE exited the Net-Zero Asset Owner Alliance (NZAOA) in March 2025, its Target-Setting Protocol continued to serve as a reference point in shaping QBE's approach to target-setting and climate strategy. The updated investment targets reflect consideration of portfolio composition and market factors, complemented by peer benchmarking and reference to relevant external frameworks. QBE adopted recognised metrics and data sources, aligning measurement to the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF) where practicable. While these targets have not been reviewed by an external third party, they have been internally endorsed and approved through governance processes consistent with those applied to operational and supply chain targets.
Performance against targets
Energy use: QBE achieved its energy use target in 2025, supported by continued optimisation of the property portfolio, including transition to more energy-efficient buildings in North America and the sale of office premises and relocation to smaller sites. Although no formal targets have been set beyond 2025, QBE will continue to identify and implement opportunities for reducing energy consumption, with energy use to be monitored as part of QBE's GHG emissions targets from 2026.
Renewable electricity use: Since 2021, QBE has met its renewable electricity commitment, with 100% of electricity use across its offices (excluding Bermuda and Pacific Islands) sourced from certified renewable sources, achieved through a combination of green energy contracts and unbundled energy attribute certificates. Following expiry of the commitment on 31 December 2025, QBE intends to continue sourcing renewable electricity in all countries where certified options are available.
Scope 1 and 2: In 2025, QBE continued to decarbonise its operations through property portfolio optimisation, fleet efficiency and renewable electricity sourcing, including phase-out of gas heating (a major leased office in the UK completed transition to a fully electric HVAC system) and evaluation of fleet efficiency strategies in North America.
Scope 3: For business travel, travel planning principles continued to be applied, including prioritisation of virtual collaboration and strategic selection of meeting locations. For energy-related activities, upstream emissions associated with purchased electricity and natural gas reflect energy efficiency initiatives and renewable electricity sourcing.
Investments – Engagement: QBE identified the 20 highest emitters in its investment grade corporate credit portfolio based on Scope 1 and 2 carbon intensity, and conducted targeted engagement with these issuers during the year. During 2025, QBE engaged with all external investment managers as part of the annual due diligence review process. QBE requested private fund managers to self-assess their funds' categorisation under the NZIF to establish a baseline across private fund investments, to inform 2026 engagement priorities.
Investments – Financing the transition: QBE met its climate solutions target of at least 5% of assets under management in 2024 and 2025. At 31 December 2025, climate solutions represented 7% of the Group's assets under management. From 2026, QBE will transition to a new target to invest $200 million in climate solutions annually through to 2030, representing a commitment of $1 billion over five years.
Investments – Carbon intensity: QBE met its carbon intensity target of 25% reduction in its developed market equity portfolio, achieving 57 tCO2e/$M, a 36% reduction against the 2019 baseline of 90 tCO2e/$M. The WACI of QBE's investment grade corporate credit portfolio was 17 tCO2e/$M sales at balance date, within the target range of 15 to <70 tCO2e/$M sales (low carbon risk rating). From 2026, this will be replaced by the updated WACI target.
GHG emissions target details
The operational net-zero ambition covers Scope 1, Scope 2 (market-based), and selected Scope 3 emissions related to fuel- and energy-related activities (Category 3) and business travel (Category 6). The net-zero target is expressed on a net basis, reflecting the intended use of carbon removals to offset residual emissions after the implementation of emissions reduction initiatives; a gross target of 16,900 tCO2e by 2030 is also disclosed. The defined inventory of Scope 3 emissions included in the Group's carbon neutrality commitment covers a broader range of emission sources than those included in the net-zero target. The revised target excludes Scope 3 emissions related to capital goods (Category 2), reflecting QBE's limited ability to influence emissions associated with producing these assets, and excludes mobile combustion emissions from employee personal use of QBE's leased vehicles and associated upstream fuel and energy emissions given QBE's limited influence over these sources. Externally hosted data centres have been reclassified to Category 1 (previously disclosed in Category 3) to align with relevant guidance following a review informed by AASB S2 considerations. The Group's refreshed operational emissions targets are not derived using a sectoral decarbonisation approach.
Carbon credits: In 2025, QBE purchased and retired avoidance-based carbon offsets to maintain carbon neutrality across the defined inventory of operational emissions, including: South East Arnhem Land Fire Abatement Project (SEALFA) (Australian National Registry of Emissions Units – Clean Energy Regulator, project ERF101624, Australia, KACCU Indigenous Savanna Fire Management methodology); Bundled Wind Power Project by Giriraj Enterprises (Verra, VCS1669, India, Energy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources), ACM0002); Satara Wind Power Project in Maharashtra, India (Verra, VCS1519); 44MW Wind Bundle in Maharashtra by Enercon (India) Limited (Verra, VCS489); Berges Wind Power Project by Innores Elektrik Uretim A.S. (Gold Standard, GS5229, Turkey, Wind); CrowLake Wind Emissions Reduction Project (Verra, VCS756, United States of America, Energy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources) (Wind)). Business entity: Qantas Airways Limited (Qantas), an authorised representative (CAR 000261363) of TEM Financial Services Pty Ltd selling the offset (ABN 58 142 268 479, AFSL 430036). All avoidance-based carbon offsets are registered with third-party internationally recognised verification standards, including Gold Standard, Verra's Verified Carbon Standard (VCS), and Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs). As part of QBE's broader decarbonisation strategy, QBE plans to procure carbon removals to cover emissions within the scope of QBE's 2030 net-zero operational target. Both nature-based and technology-based solutions will be considered, with a focus on projects that demonstrate durable carbon storage and climate benefits.