← All companies

Origin Energy Limited

ASX: ORGIndustry: Electric & Gas UtilitiesAuditor: Ernst & YoungFY2026Group: Group 1
View original report →

GovernanceGovernance

AASB S2 paragraphs 5–7, Aus7.1

Governance body oversight and management's role

Reported

Board and committees (p.158). The Board keeps ultimate responsibility for strategy and considers energy transition and climate target impacts in material decisions. Roles are set out in charters. The Safety and Sustainability Committee recommends climate strategy commitments, actions and emissions reduction targets and reviews target progress at least annually. The Remuneration, People and Culture Committee considers safety and sustainability metrics, including climate performance, for remuneration. The Audit and Risk Committee oversees assurance of the climate disclosures. The Nomination Committee considers climate-related skills in Board membership criteria.

Decisions (p.158). In FY26 climate-related risks and opportunities were considered in approving the fourth stage of the Eraring battery project, progressing pre-FID activities for the Yanco Delta Wind Farm and extending Eraring Power Station operations to 30 April 2029, weighing 2030 targets against security, reliability and affordability. The Board reviews them at least annually.

Management (p.159). The CEO, the most senior individual responsible, sits on the Board and the Safety and Sustainability Committee. Two Executive Leadership Team committees support Board committee reporting. The Executive General Managers of Retail, Integrated Gas, Energy Supply and Operations, and Origin Zero identify, assess and manage climate-related risks. Climate considerations sit in short term and long term incentives.

StrategyStrategy

AASB S2 paragraphs 10–11

Climate-related risks and opportunities

Reported

The climate-related risks and opportunities (CRROs) are set out as seven items, each with a description, a short, medium and long term assessment, the financial statement areas affected and management actions (pp.160–170):

  • Transition Risk 1: project delays and supply constraints arising from increased demand associated with the energy transition (p.161)
  • Transition Risk 2: impact of climate policy and regulatory changes on financial performance (p.162)
  • Transition Risk 3: accelerated decline in fossil fuel demand (p.164)
  • Transition Risk 4/Transition Opportunity 1: increased volatility from a disruptive transition (p.165)
  • Transition Risk 5/Transition Opportunity 2: reputation, stakeholder expectations and access to capital (p.167)
  • Transition Opportunity 3: growth through the energy transition (p.168)
  • Physical Risk 1: extreme weather events and changing climate impacts, acute (rainfall and floods, storms and cyclones, bushfires, extreme temperatures) and chronic (mean temperature and precipitation) (p.170)

Short term is 1–3 years, medium term 4–10 years and long term 10+ years (p.160). Origin says these are broadly aligned with its strategic planning horizons and reflect the investment timeline of long term assets, capital allocation, investor timeframes and targets (p.184). CRROs were identified using reasonable and supportable information available at the reporting date without undue cost or effort (p.184).

AASB S2 paragraph 13

Business model and value chain

Reported

Business model and value chain (p.184). Origin describes itself as an integrated energy company operating mainly in Australia across electricity generation, energy retail and integrated gas, with thermal generation, renewables and storage assets, a large retail customer base, an equity interest in Australia Pacific LNG (upstream gas production to LNG export) and investments in Octopus Energy and Kraken Technologies. It refers readers to the Operating and Financial Review for the business model (pp.160, 184).

Where items sit (p.160). A diagram maps each item to value chain areas. Energy Markets: fuel supply, transportation, generation and trading, networks, customer solutions. Australia Pacific LNG: exploration and appraisal, drilling and gathering, processing and transport, domestic customers, liquefaction and export customers. Octopus Energy: customer solutions. No material risks or opportunities apply to Kraken Technologies. Physical risks are aggregated across generation assets, key transmission and distribution networks, Integrated Gas production and Australia Pacific LNG gathering and transmission (p.170). Under the High Emissions pathway the most exposed parts are upstream gas production in Queensland and generation across the NEM (p.176).

Effects by business (p.172). Australia Pacific LNG is labeled most exposed, Generation transitioning, and Retail and Origin Zero, and Octopus Energy and Kraken Technologies, growth potential.

AASB S2 paragraph 14

Strategy and decision-making

Reported

Transition plan (pp.177–178). The plan is organized around three strategic objectives; the 2025 Climate Transition Action Plan (CTAP) outlines the ambition to lead the energy transition.

  • Deliver reliable energy through the transition: exiting coal-fired generation is the most significant single emissions reduction step; Eraring Power Station operations were extended to 30 April 2029, which Origin says is not expected to affect the 2030 targets or 2050 ambition. A helicopter-based methane monitoring trial was run (p.177).
  • Accelerate renewable and cleaner energy: Origin aims to grow renewables and storage from 2.8 GW operational at 30 June 2026 to 4–5 GW by 2030. In FY26, 1 GW of the 1.8 GW of owned and contracted batteries committed began commercial operations, rising to 1.3 GW with Mortlake from 11 August 2026 (p.178).
  • Unrivalled customer solutions: Origin Loop grew to about 1.6 GW across more than 409,000 connected services; 2,841 EVs under management (p.178).

Resourcing (p.178). $742 million of capital expenditure, financing and investment was deployed towards climate-related risks and opportunities in FY26, with capital investment made with regard to emissions targets through the capital allocation framework.

Uncertainties for the targets and ambition (pp.181–182). Timing of new renewables and transmission, NEM demand, permitting and approvals, community concerns, asset retirement timing and policy certainty.

AASB S2 paragraphs 15–21

Financial position, financial performance and cash flows

Reported

Anticipated effects are shown by horizon, on a real, average annualized, before tax basis, mitigated and modeled to FY50 (p.160). Low is $50 million to $100 million, Moderate $100 million to $200 million and High more than $200 million, with no upper bound disclosed for High because of measurement uncertainty (p.160).

ShortMediumLong
Transition Risk 1 (p.161)Not materialNot materialNot material
Transition Risk 2 (p.162)HighHighLow
Transition Risk 3 (p.164)Not materialModerateModerate
Transition Risk 4/Opportunity 1, net (p.165)Not materialModerateNot material
Transition Risk 5/Opportunity 2 (p.167)Not quantifiedNot quantifiedNot quantified
Transition Opportunity 3 (p.168)Not quantifiedNot quantifiedNot quantified
Physical Risk 1 (p.170)Not materialNot materialNot material

For the two items not quantified, Origin says measurement uncertainty is too high for the information to be decision-useful, and lists the line items affected (pp.167–169). Current effects: no material financial impacts for Transition Risks 1, 2, 3 and 5, though Risk 2 lists regulatory costs (certificate expenses, Safeguard Mechanism Credits) without amounts (p.162); Transition Risk 4/Opportunity 1 and Opportunity 3 cannot be quantified in isolation; Physical Risk 1 is not material (about $50 million). Each item states no significant risk of material adjustment is anticipated in FY27.

AASB S2 paragraph 22

Climate resilience and scenario analysis

Reported

Scenarios (p.173). Low Emissions pathway: warming limited to 1.5°C, using IEA World Energy Outlook Net Zero Emissions, AEMO Green Energy Exports and IPCC SSP1–1.9. High Emissions pathway: warming of approximately 2.8°C to 4.6°C, using IEA World Energy Outlook Current Policies, AEMO Progressive Change, IPCC SSP3–7.0 and the Australian Government National Climate Risk Assessment. Physical risks are tested under higher warming, transition risks and opportunities under lower warming. The analysis was performed in FY26 for the Origin consolidated group (p.172).

Low Emissions (pp.174–175). The most adverse exposure is Australia Pacific LNG: an impairment of approximately $2,800 million of the equity accounted investment, with cash flows positive in the short term, distributions softening in the medium term and a negative cash flow tail in the long term. The Australia Pacific LNG analysis is primarily based on pricing assumption adjustments (p.174).

High Emissions (pp.175–176). Transition pressure on gas and LNG would be lower but physical hazard exposure would rise across all three horizons.

Conclusion and capacity to adapt (p.176). Origin considers its strategy and business model resilient across the scenarios and horizons. Levers: Eraring ceasing operation by 30 April 2029 with site repurposing (short term); retaining, upgrading or retiring the gas peaker fleet (medium term); investment-grade credit metrics. Uncertainties are listed per pathway (pp.175–176).

Risk ManagementRisk Management

AASB S2 paragraphs 24–26, Aus26.1

Processes for identifying, assessing and managing climate-related risks

Reported

Process (p.159). The enterprise risk management framework embeds risk management in ongoing activities. Risks are categorized by area impacted and assessed on likelihood and magnitude of consequences, financial and non-financial, so climate-related risks are prioritized alongside other risks on a consistent basis, then escalated and monitored according to assessed materiality.

Scenario analysis (p.159). Climate-specific scenario analysis supports identification of CRROs through long term financial planning, major transaction and capital investment decisions, transition action planning and resilience testing, and is used where appropriate to assess likelihood, nature and potential impact of transition and physical risks.

Investment decisions (p.159). Major transactions and capital investments consider CRROs, the emissions profile of investments and links to targets. For some projects a sensitivity analysis applies Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCU) pricing; in FY26 a real price range of $36 to $89 per tonne was applied.

FY26 assessment (p.159). Subject matter experts across the business assessed CRROs, mapped them across the value chain in line with AASB S2 and used the resilience testing scenarios.

Integration (p.159). Management applies processes integrated with existing risk management, strategy, capital allocation, assurance and reporting frameworks; controls over climate data and disclosures align with broader internal processes.

Metrics & TargetsMetrics and Targets

AASB S2 paragraphs 29–31

Climate-related metrics

Partial
Partial disclosure: No amount or percentage is given for assets or business activities vulnerable to physical risks (paragraph 29(c)). Each transition risk and opportunity item carries an exposure figure (pp.161–169), but the Physical Risk 1 item (p.170) says only that all of Origin's portfolio is exposed. The climate section does not give the percentage of executive remuneration linked to climate; it points to section 4.2.6 of the Remuneration Report, which gives it separately for short term incentives (climate scorecard weighting averaging 17.0%, contributing on average 11.9% of executives' short term incentive outcomes) and long term incentives (14.4% of the remuneration recognized in FY26) (p.78). Origin claims transition relief for comparatives and Scope 3 (p.158) but discloses Scope 1, 2 and 3 comparatives and FY26 Scope 3 voluntarily, and applies jurisdictional relief for the Scope 1 and 2 measurement method (p.183).

Emissions, equity share basis, kt CO2-e (p.183).

FY26FY25FY24
Scope 1, consolidated accounting group13,96715,11414,874
Scope 1, other investees954935912
Total Scope 114,92116,04915,786
Scope 2, consolidated accounting group190206134
Scope 2, other investees612655674
Total Scope 2 (location-based)802861808
Scope 3, 1. Purchased goods and services1,446
3. Fuel and energy-related activities5,722
11. Use of sold products16,830
15. Investments3,530
Other Scope 3 (includes categories 9 and 10)792
Total Scope 328,32128,23328,394
Total Scope 1, 2 and 344,04345,14344,988
Intensity (t CO2-e/TJ)555758

Scope 1 and 2 follow the NGER Measurement Determination under jurisdictional relief. Transition relief applies to comparatives and Scope 3, both disclosed voluntarily (p.158).

Other metrics. Assets or activities exposed (pp.161–169; bases differ): Transition Risk 1 ~$1 billion (5%); Risk 2 ~$12.5 billion (82%); Risk 3 ~$1 billion owned and ~$2 billion equity accounted (14%); Risk 4/Opportunity 1 ~$8.5 billion (54%); Risk 5/Opportunity 2 100%; Opportunity 3 ~$11 billion owned and ~$7 billion equity accounted (73%). Capital deployed in FY26: $742 million (p.178). Carbon price: real $36 to $89 per tonne in sensitivity analysis (p.159). Remuneration: see Remuneration Report, p.78.

AASB S2 paragraphs 33–36, Aus37.1

Climate-related targets

Reported

Voluntary 2030 targets (pp.179, 181). Both cover gross Scope 1, 2 and 3 equity emissions, including Australia Pacific LNG's equity share, from an FY19 baseline; objective: mitigation.

TargetFY19 baselineFY26FY30 target
Equity emissions intensity, 40% reduction (t CO2-e/TJ)665540
Absolute equity emissions, 20 million tonne reduction (Mt CO2-e)534433

FY26 absolute emissions were down about 1 Mt CO2-e from FY25 and 17% below FY19 (p.181). Gases: CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs and SF6. Developed with regard to Paris Agreement goals and third-party 1.5°C scenarios; the Sectoral Decarbonisation Approach informed the intensity target. EY gave limited assurance over the intensity target-setting approach in 2022; targets are reviewed annually; no material adjustment in FY26. Carbon offsets are not currently used or regarded in tracking progress; credits are not in the projected pathway but may be considered for an unanticipated shortfall (p.179).

Required by law or regulation (pp.179–180). Safeguard Mechanism baselines for three Australia Pacific LNG facilities; federal and state certificate surrender obligations (about 10 million LGCs and STCs; about 9 million state certificates).

Net zero 2050 (p.182). An ambition Origin says is distinct from its targets (the voluntary medium term and legally required ones, p.179). Residual emissions are expected to be addressed with carbon removals and voluntary carbon credits.