Origin Energy Limited
GovernanceGovernance
Governance body oversight and management's role
Board and committees (p.158). The Board keeps ultimate responsibility for strategy and considers energy transition and climate target impacts in material decisions. Roles are set out in charters. The Safety and Sustainability Committee recommends climate strategy commitments, actions and emissions reduction targets and reviews target progress at least annually. The Remuneration, People and Culture Committee considers safety and sustainability metrics, including climate performance, for remuneration. The Audit and Risk Committee oversees assurance of the climate disclosures. The Nomination Committee considers climate-related skills in Board membership criteria.
Decisions (p.158). In FY26 climate-related risks and opportunities were considered in approving the fourth stage of the Eraring battery project, progressing pre-FID activities for the Yanco Delta Wind Farm and extending Eraring Power Station operations to 30 April 2029, weighing 2030 targets against security, reliability and affordability. The Board reviews them at least annually.
Management (p.159). The CEO, the most senior individual responsible, sits on the Board and the Safety and Sustainability Committee. Two Executive Leadership Team committees support Board committee reporting. The Executive General Managers of Retail, Integrated Gas, Energy Supply and Operations, and Origin Zero identify, assess and manage climate-related risks. Climate considerations sit in short term and long term incentives.
StrategyStrategy
Climate-related risks and opportunities
The climate-related risks and opportunities (CRROs) are set out as seven items, each with a description, a short, medium and long term assessment, the financial statement areas affected and management actions (pp.160–170):
- Transition Risk 1: project delays and supply constraints arising from increased demand associated with the energy transition (p.161)
- Transition Risk 2: impact of climate policy and regulatory changes on financial performance (p.162)
- Transition Risk 3: accelerated decline in fossil fuel demand (p.164)
- Transition Risk 4/Transition Opportunity 1: increased volatility from a disruptive transition (p.165)
- Transition Risk 5/Transition Opportunity 2: reputation, stakeholder expectations and access to capital (p.167)
- Transition Opportunity 3: growth through the energy transition (p.168)
- Physical Risk 1: extreme weather events and changing climate impacts, acute (rainfall and floods, storms and cyclones, bushfires, extreme temperatures) and chronic (mean temperature and precipitation) (p.170)
Short term is 1–3 years, medium term 4–10 years and long term 10+ years (p.160). Origin says these are broadly aligned with its strategic planning horizons and reflect the investment timeline of long term assets, capital allocation, investor timeframes and targets (p.184). CRROs were identified using reasonable and supportable information available at the reporting date without undue cost or effort (p.184).
Business model and value chain
Business model and value chain (p.184). Origin describes itself as an integrated energy company operating mainly in Australia across electricity generation, energy retail and integrated gas, with thermal generation, renewables and storage assets, a large retail customer base, an equity interest in Australia Pacific LNG (upstream gas production to LNG export) and investments in Octopus Energy and Kraken Technologies. It refers readers to the Operating and Financial Review for the business model (pp.160, 184).
Where items sit (p.160). A diagram maps each item to value chain areas. Energy Markets: fuel supply, transportation, generation and trading, networks, customer solutions. Australia Pacific LNG: exploration and appraisal, drilling and gathering, processing and transport, domestic customers, liquefaction and export customers. Octopus Energy: customer solutions. No material risks or opportunities apply to Kraken Technologies. Physical risks are aggregated across generation assets, key transmission and distribution networks, Integrated Gas production and Australia Pacific LNG gathering and transmission (p.170). Under the High Emissions pathway the most exposed parts are upstream gas production in Queensland and generation across the NEM (p.176).
Effects by business (p.172). Australia Pacific LNG is labeled most exposed, Generation transitioning, and Retail and Origin Zero, and Octopus Energy and Kraken Technologies, growth potential.
Strategy and decision-making
Transition plan (pp.177–178). The plan is organized around three strategic objectives; the 2025 Climate Transition Action Plan (CTAP) outlines the ambition to lead the energy transition.
- Deliver reliable energy through the transition: exiting coal-fired generation is the most significant single emissions reduction step; Eraring Power Station operations were extended to 30 April 2029, which Origin says is not expected to affect the 2030 targets or 2050 ambition. A helicopter-based methane monitoring trial was run (p.177).
- Accelerate renewable and cleaner energy: Origin aims to grow renewables and storage from 2.8 GW operational at 30 June 2026 to 4–5 GW by 2030. In FY26, 1 GW of the 1.8 GW of owned and contracted batteries committed began commercial operations, rising to 1.3 GW with Mortlake from 11 August 2026 (p.178).
- Unrivalled customer solutions: Origin Loop grew to about 1.6 GW across more than 409,000 connected services; 2,841 EVs under management (p.178).
Resourcing (p.178). $742 million of capital expenditure, financing and investment was deployed towards climate-related risks and opportunities in FY26, with capital investment made with regard to emissions targets through the capital allocation framework.
Uncertainties for the targets and ambition (pp.181–182). Timing of new renewables and transmission, NEM demand, permitting and approvals, community concerns, asset retirement timing and policy certainty.
Financial position, financial performance and cash flows
Anticipated effects are shown by horizon, on a real, average annualized, before tax basis, mitigated and modeled to FY50 (p.160). Low is $50 million to $100 million, Moderate $100 million to $200 million and High more than $200 million, with no upper bound disclosed for High because of measurement uncertainty (p.160).
| Short | Medium | Long | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transition Risk 1 (p.161) | Not material | Not material | Not material |
| Transition Risk 2 (p.162) | High | High | Low |
| Transition Risk 3 (p.164) | Not material | Moderate | Moderate |
| Transition Risk 4/Opportunity 1, net (p.165) | Not material | Moderate | Not material |
| Transition Risk 5/Opportunity 2 (p.167) | Not quantified | Not quantified | Not quantified |
| Transition Opportunity 3 (p.168) | Not quantified | Not quantified | Not quantified |
| Physical Risk 1 (p.170) | Not material | Not material | Not material |
For the two items not quantified, Origin says measurement uncertainty is too high for the information to be decision-useful, and lists the line items affected (pp.167–169). Current effects: no material financial impacts for Transition Risks 1, 2, 3 and 5, though Risk 2 lists regulatory costs (certificate expenses, Safeguard Mechanism Credits) without amounts (p.162); Transition Risk 4/Opportunity 1 and Opportunity 3 cannot be quantified in isolation; Physical Risk 1 is not material (about $50 million). Each item states no significant risk of material adjustment is anticipated in FY27.
Climate resilience and scenario analysis
Scenarios (p.173). Low Emissions pathway: warming limited to 1.5°C, using IEA World Energy Outlook Net Zero Emissions, AEMO Green Energy Exports and IPCC SSP1–1.9. High Emissions pathway: warming of approximately 2.8°C to 4.6°C, using IEA World Energy Outlook Current Policies, AEMO Progressive Change, IPCC SSP3–7.0 and the Australian Government National Climate Risk Assessment. Physical risks are tested under higher warming, transition risks and opportunities under lower warming. The analysis was performed in FY26 for the Origin consolidated group (p.172).
Low Emissions (pp.174–175). The most adverse exposure is Australia Pacific LNG: an impairment of approximately $2,800 million of the equity accounted investment, with cash flows positive in the short term, distributions softening in the medium term and a negative cash flow tail in the long term. The Australia Pacific LNG analysis is primarily based on pricing assumption adjustments (p.174).
High Emissions (pp.175–176). Transition pressure on gas and LNG would be lower but physical hazard exposure would rise across all three horizons.
Conclusion and capacity to adapt (p.176). Origin considers its strategy and business model resilient across the scenarios and horizons. Levers: Eraring ceasing operation by 30 April 2029 with site repurposing (short term); retaining, upgrading or retiring the gas peaker fleet (medium term); investment-grade credit metrics. Uncertainties are listed per pathway (pp.175–176).
Risk ManagementRisk Management
Processes for identifying, assessing and managing climate-related risks
Process (p.159). The enterprise risk management framework embeds risk management in ongoing activities. Risks are categorized by area impacted and assessed on likelihood and magnitude of consequences, financial and non-financial, so climate-related risks are prioritized alongside other risks on a consistent basis, then escalated and monitored according to assessed materiality.
Scenario analysis (p.159). Climate-specific scenario analysis supports identification of CRROs through long term financial planning, major transaction and capital investment decisions, transition action planning and resilience testing, and is used where appropriate to assess likelihood, nature and potential impact of transition and physical risks.
Investment decisions (p.159). Major transactions and capital investments consider CRROs, the emissions profile of investments and links to targets. For some projects a sensitivity analysis applies Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCU) pricing; in FY26 a real price range of $36 to $89 per tonne was applied.
FY26 assessment (p.159). Subject matter experts across the business assessed CRROs, mapped them across the value chain in line with AASB S2 and used the resilience testing scenarios.
Integration (p.159). Management applies processes integrated with existing risk management, strategy, capital allocation, assurance and reporting frameworks; controls over climate data and disclosures align with broader internal processes.
Metrics & TargetsMetrics and Targets
Climate-related metrics
Emissions, equity share basis, kt CO2-e (p.183).
| FY26 | FY25 | FY24 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1, consolidated accounting group | 13,967 | 15,114 | 14,874 |
| Scope 1, other investees | 954 | 935 | 912 |
| Total Scope 1 | 14,921 | 16,049 | 15,786 |
| Scope 2, consolidated accounting group | 190 | 206 | 134 |
| Scope 2, other investees | 612 | 655 | 674 |
| Total Scope 2 (location-based) | 802 | 861 | 808 |
| Scope 3, 1. Purchased goods and services | 1,446 | ||
| 3. Fuel and energy-related activities | 5,722 | ||
| 11. Use of sold products | 16,830 | ||
| 15. Investments | 3,530 | ||
| Other Scope 3 (includes categories 9 and 10) | 792 | ||
| Total Scope 3 | 28,321 | 28,233 | 28,394 |
| Total Scope 1, 2 and 3 | 44,043 | 45,143 | 44,988 |
| Intensity (t CO2-e/TJ) | 55 | 57 | 58 |
Scope 1 and 2 follow the NGER Measurement Determination under jurisdictional relief. Transition relief applies to comparatives and Scope 3, both disclosed voluntarily (p.158).
Other metrics. Assets or activities exposed (pp.161–169; bases differ): Transition Risk 1 ~$1 billion (5%); Risk 2 ~$12.5 billion (82%); Risk 3 ~$1 billion owned and ~$2 billion equity accounted (14%); Risk 4/Opportunity 1 ~$8.5 billion (54%); Risk 5/Opportunity 2 100%; Opportunity 3 ~$11 billion owned and ~$7 billion equity accounted (73%). Capital deployed in FY26: $742 million (p.178). Carbon price: real $36 to $89 per tonne in sensitivity analysis (p.159). Remuneration: see Remuneration Report, p.78.
Climate-related targets
Voluntary 2030 targets (pp.179, 181). Both cover gross Scope 1, 2 and 3 equity emissions, including Australia Pacific LNG's equity share, from an FY19 baseline; objective: mitigation.
| Target | FY19 baseline | FY26 | FY30 target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity emissions intensity, 40% reduction (t CO2-e/TJ) | 66 | 55 | 40 |
| Absolute equity emissions, 20 million tonne reduction (Mt CO2-e) | 53 | 44 | 33 |
FY26 absolute emissions were down about 1 Mt CO2-e from FY25 and 17% below FY19 (p.181). Gases: CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs and SF6. Developed with regard to Paris Agreement goals and third-party 1.5°C scenarios; the Sectoral Decarbonisation Approach informed the intensity target. EY gave limited assurance over the intensity target-setting approach in 2022; targets are reviewed annually; no material adjustment in FY26. Carbon offsets are not currently used or regarded in tracking progress; credits are not in the projected pathway but may be considered for an unanticipated shortfall (p.179).
Required by law or regulation (pp.179–180). Safeguard Mechanism baselines for three Australia Pacific LNG facilities; federal and state certificate surrender obligations (about 10 million LGCs and STCs; about 9 million state certificates).
Net zero 2050 (p.182). An ambition Origin says is distinct from its targets (the voluntary medium term and legally required ones, p.179). Residual emissions are expected to be addressed with carbon removals and voluntary carbon credits.