← All companies

Lendlease Group

ASX: LLCIndustry: Residential & Property DevelopmentAuditor: KPMGFY2026Group: Group 1
View original report →

GovernanceGovernance

AASB S2 paragraphs 5–7, Aus7.1

Governance body oversight and management's role

Reported

Oversight (pp. 73–74). The Board oversees strategic decisions on climate-related risks and opportunities (CRROs), assisted by the Risk and Sustainability Committee and the Audit Committee, which report to it quarterly. The Risk and Sustainability Committee monitors management in achieving the sustainability strategy, receives quarterly reports and verbal briefings from the Climate-related Financial Disclosure Steering Committee (CRFD SteerCo), is updated on progress against climate metrics and targets and informed of forward-looking CRROs, which it can consider when making or overseeing business decisions, and with the Board reviews and approves climate-related targets and disclosures. The Audit Committee reviews and approves climate-related disclosures. Mandates are in committee charters.

Management (p. 73). The CRFD SteerCo, co-chaired by the Head of Corporate Sustainability and Group Finance Controller, oversees day-to-day climate risk management and disclosure and meets quarterly. Controls for each CRRO are on pp. 77 to 84.

Skills (p. 74). Directors self-assess core competencies annually, including experience in identifying and monitoring environmental, climate and social risks and opportunities and knowledge of sustainability reporting standards.

Remuneration (p. 73). A carbon emissions target was a non-financial Short Term Awards measure in prior years; in FY26 the Board chose not to include it as a remuneration-linked measure.

StrategyStrategy

AASB S2 paragraphs 10–11

Climate-related risks and opportunities

Reported

Six climate-related risks and opportunities (CRROs) were identified as reasonably expected to occur and to affect the Group's prospects, based on evidence of emergence (p. 76). Information reasonably available at the relevant time was used (p. 72).

RefCRRO (p. 76)TypeHorizon (pp. 77–84)
PR1Devaluation of assets with significant exposure to rainstorm, flood, wildfire and sea-level riseAcute and chronic physicalCurrent to long term
PR2Delays to construction schedules due to increased frequency and severity of weather add to costs of constructionAcute physicalCurrent to long term
TR1Emerging regulation requires new commercial buildings to be all-electric; fossil fuel dependence may contribute to a decline in investor and tenant demandTransition, legal and marketMedium to long term
TR2Increased cost of materials as suppliers/manufacturers pass through cost of decarbonizationTransition, legal and marketCurrent to long term
TR3Regulation requires rapid carbon reductionsTransition, legalMedium to long term
TO1Opportunity to attract capital with more climate-resilient assets/productsTransition opportunity, marketCurrent to long term

Time frames (p. 76): short term 1 to 5 years (strategic planning cycles); medium term 6 to 10 years (real estate planning and development cycles); long term 11 to 25 years (asset life cycle and longer dated development project delivery).

AASB S2 paragraph 13

Business model and value chain

Reported

Where concentrated (pp. 77–84). Each climate-related risk and opportunity (CRRO) lists its concentration by business and geography: PR1 Investments, Development; PR2 Development, Construction; TR1 Investments, in Sydney, NSW and Melbourne, Vic; TR2 Development, Construction, in Australia; TR3 Investments, Development, Construction; TO1 Investments, Development.

Effects on the business and its value chain.

  • Property assets (PR1, p. 77): physical risks have potential to influence asset integrity and operational continuity, which contribute to long-term asset value.
  • Construction (PR2, p. 79): acute weather risks have potential to influence project delivery schedules.
  • Investors and tenants (TR1, p. 80): expectations for all-electric assets will increase, and existing fossil fuel dependent commercial assets may be exposed to increased vacancy rates and lower investor demand.
  • Supply chain (TR2, p. 81): decarbonization of carbon-intensive sectors is underway, and market dynamics are creating a two-tier pricing structure, with green premiums for low embodied carbon materials and rising compliance costs for traditional materials.
  • Costs (TR3, p. 83): demand for low-carbon materials and investment in electrification and high-performance building systems could increase development and construction costs.
  • Capital (TO1, p. 84): investors increasingly place a premium on assets that demonstrate physical resilience and ability to perform in a low-carbon economy.
AASB S2 paragraph 14

Strategy and decision-making

Reported

Transition plan (pp. 83, 85). Regional climate transition plans (Mission Zero Roadmaps) aim to meet Net Zero by 2025 for Scopes 1 and 2 (market-based) and Absolute Zero by 2040, without carbon offsets, for Scopes 1, 2 and 3. Five key steps: a decarbonization investment strategy; phasing out diesel and gas in operations; 100 percent renewable electricity before 2030; collaboration with supply chain partners, tenants and residents.

Pathway to Absolute Zero (p. 83). The Australian Government's commitment to net zero is expected to underpin the pathway. Significant cross-sector collaboration and industry-wide investment are required. The rate of sector-wide decarbonization depends on how and when the Built Environment Sector Plan is translated into enforceable policy settings.

Responses (pp. 77–81). The Climate Related Risk Assessment (CRRA) process (p. 77); the Weather Scenario Planning Tool (p. 79); new commercial developments planned fossil fuel free and electrification of selected Australian office assets (p. 80); lower embodied carbon procurement (p. 81).

Budgeting (p. 85). Carbon price considerations are built into Development and Construction project emissions forecasting and budgeting.

Progress (p. 85). The first milestone, Net Zero for Scopes 1 and 2 by FY25, and the 100 percent renewable electricity by 2030 goal were achieved. Outside the Sustainability Report, the Annual Report says climate transition plans are being updated (pp. 6, 20).

AASB S2 paragraphs 15–21

Financial position, financial performance and cash flows

Partial
Partial disclosure: No amount or range is given for any current or anticipated financial effect. Effects are stated as not material (PR1, PR2, TR1, and the cost of the Net Zero by 2025 target under TR3) or as not ascertainable or difficult to anticipate (TR2, future regulation under TR3, TO1), with short reasons but without citing AASB S2 paragraphs 19 to 21. For TR2 the report says the potential increased cost of materials was estimated from Scope 3 categories 1 and 2 and the 2024–25 Safeguard Mechanism default prescribed unit price (p. 82), but no result is printed. No combined financial effect is given. Anticipated effects are not set out for each of the short, medium and long term. The report gives no information on investment and disposal plans or planned sources of funding (16(c)), and does not say whether any CRRO carries a risk of material adjustment to carrying amounts in the next reporting period (16(b)).

The Paris Pledges scenario was used as the guide to assess current and anticipated financial effects (p. 76). Each CRRO page lists the Statement of Comprehensive Income, Statement of Financial Position and Statement of Cash Flows items potentially impacted (pp. 77–84).

CRROFinancial effects as stated
PR1No material asset devaluations attributable to climate-related impacts identified in FY26 (p. 77). Annual Expected Loss for assets in the FY25 balance sheet accounts (SSP2-4.5 pathway) found financially immaterial (p. 78)
PR2Not material in FY26. Existing projects have sufficient contingency, and future effects beyond existing projects cannot be anticipated as locations and contract terms are not yet known (p. 79)
TR1Cost to electrify existing commercial assets assessed, and not anticipated to be material to the Group (p. 80)
TR2Group unable to ascertain how decarbonization costs have been passed on by its supply chain, and the financial implication is difficult to anticipate (p. 82)
TR3Cost of the Net Zero by 2025 target assessed as immaterial. Anticipated effects of future regulation cannot be determined, given uncertainty over how and when the Built Environment Sector Plan is translated into enforceable policy settings (p. 83)
TO1Quantifying increased access to capital is challenging. Climate resilience is anticipated to play an increasingly important role in capital allocation decisions (p. 84)
AASB S2 paragraph 22

Climate resilience and scenario analysis

Reported

Scenarios (p. 75). The Group updated its 3 climate scenarios in 2025 (initial analysis 2019–2022) using IPCC and IEA projections, selected in line with AASB S2 and the Corporations Act 2001 to capture transition and physical risks. Modeling is primarily qualitative, with quantitative analysis where appropriate. Impacts were assessed over the short, medium and long term.

TransformationParis PledgesPolarisation
Degree of warming≤2°C2-3°C3-4°C
IPCC Shared Socioeconomic PathwaysSSP1-2.6SSP2-4.5SSP3-7.0
IEA/WEO 2024Net Zero Emissions by 2050 (NZE) ScenarioAnnounced Pledges Scenario (APS)Stated Policies Scenario (STEPS)
IEA/ETP 2024Beyond 2 Degree Scenario (B2DS)2 Degree Scenario (2DS)Reference Technology Scenario (RTS)

Paris Pledges guided financial effects; Transformation and Polarisation were used to assess resilience (p. 76).

Resilience (pp. 78–84). Strategy and business model are likely to remain resilient for PR1 (Polarisation) and TR1, TR2 and TR3 (Transformation), and likely to reinforce resilience for TO1. For PR2 (Polarisation), the Weather Scenario Planning Tool and Delay Register Tracking data are said to improve resilience.

Uncertainty (pp. 76, 78). Scenarios are illustrative, not probabilities. SSP1-2.6 approximates a ≤1.5°C trajectory but is approximately a 1.8°C median outcome. Annual Expected Loss estimates are indicative, not precise forecasts.

Risk ManagementRisk Management

AASB S2 paragraphs 24–26, Aus26.1

Processes for identifying, assessing and managing climate-related risks

Partial
Partial disclosure: The risk management section is four short paragraphs (p. 74). Not stated: the criteria used to assess the likelihood and magnitude of effects outside the physical risk process, how climate-related risks are prioritized relative to other types of risk, and whether or how the processes changed from the previous period. Inputs and assumptions are referred to the Climate Resilience section. Integration with the enterprise risk register is described as planned rather than complete (p. 74).

Process (p. 74). The Group uses scenario analysis and a simplified version of its Enterprise Risk Management Framework to identify, assess, prioritize and test the resilience of its climate-related risk and opportunity assessments. The Climate-related Financial Disclosure Steering Committee (CRFD SteerCo) Charter sets a time frame for revisiting scenario planning in line with the strategic planning cycle, and the CRFD SteerCo oversees the key inputs, time horizons and assumptions. Capital allocation decisions and trade-offs are considered throughout.

Monitoring and integration (p. 74). Key metrics are in place to monitor potentially significant CRROs. The Group has plans to further integrate these risks and opportunities into the existing enterprise risk register.

Physical risk process (pp. 77, 79). A Climate Related Risk Assessment (CRRA) process, which sits outside the scenario analysis, applies to all new project opportunities and existing assets under management. The Swiss Re Risk Data & Services (RDS) platform estimates probability-weighted financial losses, and outputs are translated into red, amber or green levels of physical climate risk, which are included in reviews of potential investments. Assets and projects assessed at the red level must develop a mitigation plan, reported to the Risk and Sustainability Committee and tabled at Quarterly Business Reviews. Construction delays are tracked in the Lendlease Schedule Delay Register application.

Metrics & TargetsMetrics and Targets

AASB S2 paragraphs 29–31

Climate-related metrics

Partial
Partial disclosure: Scope 3 emissions are not disclosed: the Group claims the first-year relief in AASB S2 paragraph C4(b), and gives no comparatives under C3 (p. 72). No amount and percentage is given for assets or business activities vulnerable to transition risks (29(b)) or physical risks (29(c)), or for capital expenditure, financing or investment deployed towards CRROs (29(e)). The nearest items are the single-CRRO metrics above. No percentage of executive remuneration linked to climate is stated (29(g)(ii)). Net Scope 1 and 2 emissions after offsets, which the basis of preparation says are reported (p. 86), are not given in the section. The Annual Report shows net emissions after offsets of 0.0 ktCO2-eq for FY25 and for FY26 on p. 21, outside the Sustainability Report. The same page says the environmental data includes partially estimated Q4 data, and that full-year data will follow in the ESG Databook in November, once Q4 data has been gathered and the limited assurance engagement completed.
FY26 emissions (tCO2-eq, p. 85)Consolidated assets/sitesOther investeesManaged assetsTotal
Gross Scope 1 emissions (excluding biogenic emissions)12,5136,56837219,453
Gross Scope 1 biogenic emissions393280421
Gross Scope 2 emissions (market-based)01170117
Total gross emissions12,9066,71337219,991
Gross Scope 2 emissions (location-based)52,46858,2846,397117,149

Total gross emissions includes gross Scope 1 emissions and gross Scope 2 emissions (market-based). The operational control approach is used, per the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (p. 85). At publication an estimated 35 percent of the Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) in the dataset had not yet been purchased, and the Group commits to purchase and retire them after the year-end assurance of the associated emissions (p. 86).

Internal carbon price (p. 85). Carbon offset price per tCO2-eq, in Australian dollars rounded to the nearest 10 dollars: FY26 $50, FY27 $50, FY28 $60, FY29 $60, FY30 $70. Carbon price considerations are built into project emissions forecasting and budgeting at the investment decision-making stage.

Other metrics. 39 percent of commercial assets are currently fossil fuel free (p. 80). 100 percent of assets in development are targeting a top-tier rating (p. 84). A carbon emissions target is not a remuneration-linked measure in FY26 (p. 73).

AASB S2 paragraphs 33–36, Aus37.1

Climate-related targets

Partial
Partial disclosure: Performance against the Absolute Zero by 2040 target is not shown: Scope 3 emissions are not disclosed (relief C4(b), p. 72) and no emissions figures against either baseline are printed. Performance on the Net Zero target is stated in words only, with no net emissions or offset quantities in the section (the basis of preparation says net emissions after offsets are reported, p. 86). Not stated: which greenhouse gases the targets cover, whether either target was derived using a sectoral decarbonization approach, and any interim targets for Absolute Zero by 2040.
Mission Zero target (p. 85)Net ZeroAbsolute Zero
Year20252040
Scopes1 and 2 (market-based)1, 2 and 3, within the Group defined boundaries, without the use of carbon offsets
BaselineFY14FY14 (Scopes 1 and 2); FY21 (Scope 3)
TypeAbsoluteAbsolute

In 2020 the Group set targets verified by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) as aligned with the Paris Agreement goal aiming to limit warming to 1.5°C. The Absolute Zero by 2040 target has been validated by the SBTi as in line with a 1.5°C trajectory, and the Group's target was validated under the SBTi Corporate Sector pathway (p. 85). The Risk and Sustainability Committee and the Board review and approve the climate-related targets (p. 73), and progress is reported to the Committee quarterly (p. 85).

Performance (p. 85). The first milestone, Net Zero for Scope 1 and 2 by FY25, was achieved through decarbonization strategies in the transition plans. In FY26 the target was maintained by compensating for residual emissions, primarily through high-quality, nature-based removal offsets within the Australian Carbon Credit Unit Scheme. These offsets are supplied from a native regeneration project in South West Queensland and are verified and issued under the Emissions Reduction Fund (ERF), which administers Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs). The 100 percent renewable electricity by 2030 goal was achieved 5 years ahead of timetable.